Tasmanian Times

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. No price is too high for the privilege of owning yourself. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. No price is too high for the privilege of owning yourself. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche

Article

NATION: Losing our democracy? It’s as easy as ABC

First published October 1

“We need a president who isn’t a laughing stock to the entire world. We need a truly great leader, a genius at strategy and winning. Respect!” Donald Trump tweet, August 2014.

They laugh in Trump’s face at the UN, Tuesday. Twice. Is it a sign of rude good health in an international set too keen to kow-tow, suspend judgement or collude in the vainglorious delusions of the self-styled “stable genius”?

Trump is visibly taken aback; retreats into Security Adviser “barking” John Bolton’s bonkers script; pulls his head into his shell in Turtle Bay, midtown Manhattan NY site of UN Headquarters, a metonym for the UN itself. It’s Trump’s worst nightmare; his speeches are strewn with tell-tale images of being the laughing stock of the world.

The world? A hundred world leaders, ministers, ambassadors and dignitaries are present. Their laughter is an unprecedented breach of decorum. Never before have they laughed out loud at the most powerful man in the room. Or the least stable. It is not unreasonable to wonder how and when Trump will seek his revenge.

Our universe is also turned upside down. Not only is Turnbull’s pick to be ABC MD, Mal’s pal, Michelle Guthrie, unceremoniously dumped overboard shortly after she’s been made to walk the plank – an amazing coincidence as many have noted – the execution is so badly botched that ABC Board Chairman Justin Milne is forced to resign.

Intriguingly, neither Milne, nor the Minister for (mis)Communication, “bitchin'” Mitch Fifield, a minister who has made a record six complaints against the ABC in five months, can articulate why Guthrie has been boned. It’s something to do with her “leadership style”, Milne faffs around endlessly in response to pointed questions from a forensic Sales. It’s painful and damning. Incredibly, he clearly believes he has no obligation to explain himself.

Sales grills Milne on ABC 7:30 after his resignation Thursday. Weirdly, parts of the interview are used as ABC promos all that day. Did Milne resign in the studio before informing the board? Is Sales a Liberal fixer? Sales seems to push it uphill with her notion that his board stooges must explain why they didn’t act on damaging emails they had been shown between him and Ms Guthrie until after they were revealed by Fairfax Media.

Of course, she does obliquely make the point that his board is just there to rubber-stamp Milne’s decisions. Later, the nation is overjoyed to learn that one of the board, Kirstin Ferguson is to become acting deputy-chairman, meaning that she will fill Justin Milne’s shoes, at least, as the fiction goes, a new Chairman is appointed.

Or however long it takes before Ferguson’s history with Theiss is in the public domain. Thiess was involved in a 2010 bribery scandal over a $6bn Indian coal mine deal. A whistle-blower contacted Leighton’s ethical committee chair and then Thiess advisory board chair Dr Kirstin Ferguson about the payments, but no action was taken. Instead, the whistle-blower was dismissed in accordance with our new rules of corporate and offshore detention.

“I’m really glad to have you in that role. I really am,” Dr Kirstin Ferguson her whistle-blower. Ferguson was speaking to David (not his real name) who for more than two years had been working to stamp out alleged corruption and misconduct within his company, Thiess, part of the Leighton group which is implicated in serious foreign bribery and corruption cases involving negotiations over the $6 bn Indian coal mine concession.

David was suffering stress and anxiety because he feared – with good reason – that his boss was cutting him loose. Two weeks later, he was given three months’ notice and told to go immediately on “garden leave”.

Perhaps Malcolm or Lucy Turnbull are interested and available? Julie Bishop may be at a loose end soon. So, too, if predictions are accurate, could be Peter Dutton. Judging by Milne’s stonewalling and evasion, not to mention how he’s let it be known that the ABC as it stands is “dead to me”, the totally hands-off Dutto would be ideal.

The plan to combine the SBS and ABC, which Morrison magnanimously refuses to rule out, would suit someone of Dutton’s megalomaniacal temperament or would be an ideal add-on to his current suite of responsibilities. His appointment would be a logical extension of installing the PM’s mate as the government’s man on the board.

Milne, whom Fairfax media reports, refers to female colleagues as “chicks” and “babes”, finally quits after sacking MD Michelle Guthrie, “the missus”, as he refers to her in a Trump-like infantilising and objectifying of women.

Not that he’s been told to interfere or end journo’s careers. Like ScoMo, his hands are clean. Honest Injun. Evidence emerges that, in fact he’s been very “hands-on” voicing displeasure with the work of Emma Alberici, Tom Ballard and Andrew Probyn. (Curiously those like Laura Tingle and Phil Coorey who have written for other publications to express similarly heretical viewpoints have escaped unscathed.)

The singling out of ABC journalists tends to confirm that it is not just a matter of correcting errors of fact as the government maintains but, rather, a desire to eliminate dissent, as Waleed Aly writes for Fairfax. Aly contends that the week is one in which the ABC has been recast as an organisation more concerned with keeping the government happy than with the non-negotiability of journalistic independence.

For Ali, “it’s about a civic culture that is slowly falling apart: a political class with fewer civic boundaries, less concerned with the independence of institutions, and a muscular intolerance of dissent.

It’s also a ruling class is happy to cling to power by mounting increasingly legalistic, hair-splitting defences.

“I never provided instructions that anyone be sacked he tells ABC 7:30…I have never sent an email to Michelle Guthrie or anybody else, which says you must sack Emma Alberici or Andrew Probyn or anybody else.’

Yet that’s exactly what his email to Guthrie, republished by Fairfax shows he did do. Other excuses follow. His “email was taken out of context.” Astonishingly, a former PM and his personal friend is quick to back him up.

Nor, stresses Turnbull from his pad overlooking Central Park in NY, did he ever issue any such instructions. Not that he had to. Being the PM’s bestie and former OzEmail business associate would help him pick up the vibe.

Calling, hands-free, from New York, Turnbull denies instructing anyone to sack anyone. All he’s done is appoint Milne to the board; a friend he could then harangue about the performance of various journalists and their stories. Did he also get stuck into Guthrie? Who knows? Turnbull’s personal hotline to Milne would do the trick.

A lot of tosh fills the airwaves on chat shows like The Drum which help Liberal stooges to deceive voters that ABC journalists are never directly berated by politicians, an illusion Jacqueline Maley is quick to dispel. She notes our nation’s “sharp segue from a national conversation about media interference in the politics, following the (latest) spill, to political interference in the media.”

It’s less a national conversation – more that the nation is dumbfounded by a collective sense of outrage.

Incredibly the rest of the ABC is struck dumb. Not a peep is heard from other Liberal stooges on the broadcaster’s board – five of whom were appointed directly by Communications Minister, Mitch Fifield- aka “the talking toilet brush”, who appears also to be able to bypass regulations designed to ward off political influence with impunity.

Just as they sat on Milne’s email since Friday. The chairman was making an inappropriate if not illegal request. Were they so in thrall they were powerless? What was stopping any one of them from blowing the whistle?

Breaking rules with impunity are our usurious robber-barons of banking. Commissioner Kenneth Hayne’s interim report of his banking and financial services Royal Commission hammers banks and slack regulators.

“… the conduct identified and criticised in this report was driven by the pursuit of profit – the entity’s revenue and profit and the individual actor’s profit. Employees of banks learned to treat sales, or revenue and profit, as the measure of their success.”  (And not just banks.) He should next have a word with Centrelink about Robodebt.

“Too often, the answer seems to be greed — the pursuit of short-term profit at the expense of basic standards of honesty,” he says. “How else is charging continuing advice fees to the dead to be explained?”

Part of the answer is that neoliberalism itself is dead. Hayne would do well to refer to The Australia Institute’s Richard Denniss, How Neoliberalism Ate Itself. Yet, as Denniss concludes, even as a corpse, the false idea that what is good for business is good for the country has so much rhetorical and political clout in Australia – it has vitiated if not utterly corrupted healthy social relationships. Even caring has become a “service delivery industry”.

Hayne sees a problem in bankers’ pay structure; a base salary supplemented with incentives or bonuses an inducement to greed. “Greed, for lack of a better word, is good. Greed is right. Greed works,” chortles the deluded Gordon Gekko, a satirical character in Wall Street (1987.) While Wall Street foresaw the era in which we live, one defined by greater inequality and the normalisation of corporate greed, Gekko is not a role model.

Greed is not good for us; let alone our banks – despite the claims of parliamentarians and The Business Council of Australia who witter on endlessly about “flexibility”, code for even more casual, underpaid, underemployment.

Claims? Two years ago, Arthur Sinodinos gave a gold standard definition when he railed against entitlements, defending Steve Irons who spent thousands on airfares and accommodation to attend Melbourne’s Derby Day and a golf tournament on the Gold Coast. On another occasion, Steve charged taxpayers to get to his own wedding.

“These are work expenses which are paid for by the taxpayer.” Some say MPs work hard and are entitled to everything they get – or it prevents bribery. It’s as specious as the claim that bankers won’t work properly, or even stay in Australia, unless they receive special incentives or help to profiteer.

Irons’ claims were all honoured. Haynes is not having a bar of it. Even his interim report has stirred the possum.

It’s put the wind up Scott Morrison who voted against a Royal Commission 26 times. ASIC, he falsely claimed, had greater powers. Yet now, novice-Treasurer Josh Frydenberg makes ASIC the scapegoat. Another stunning reversal.

Frydenberg blames the regulators, namely ASIC for seeking “negotiated outcomes” instead of pursuing litigation or forcing entities to face the courts. This strategy saw ASIC working too closely with the sector it was regulating.

Yet, as Kaye Lee reports in The AIMN, ASIC was crippled by Coalition funding cuts. And it gave fair warning. After Tony Abbott cut ASIC’s budget $120 million in 2014, she notes, its chairman Greg Medcraft, warned that over 200 staff would be cut. Worse. The regulator just couldn’t do its job properly.

“Our proactive surveillance will substantially reduce across the sectors we regulate, and in some cases stop.”

In many cases it did. In 2016, Scott Morrison was inspired to announce “reforms” to shift the regulator to a “user-pays” funding model – in which the institutions it regulates are forced to pay for the ongoing cost of their regulation – so taxpayers no longer have to fund its operations, a brilliant incentive to ignore infringements.

Similarly, as with recent Coalition governments, a culture of evasion, secrecy and lies is nurtured. Hayne warns.

“If the short term incentive scheme reduces the amount allowed if an employee does not meet some standard (of accuracy, or behaviour) the employee may focus as much upon avoiding error being discovered as upon avoidance of error.”

May or will? In his bravura performances of the week, banking royal commissioner, captivating Kenny Hayne, concludes, in his sonorous, gravel baritone, the interim stage of his mini-morality play by finding vice is to blame. Vice is leads to usury, theft, extortion not to mention collusion over interest rate fixing or an oligopoly itself.

“Too often, the answer seems to be greed — the pursuit of short-term profit at the expense of basic standards of honesty,” he writes. It’s not his lines so much but the way he delivers them that make him such a crack-up.

Another funny man, Donald Trump is laughed at by the UN, the butt of an entire world’s jokes. But not by its loyal cultural colony of Australia, a satellite of mateship to whom, as Turnbull says, the US is “joined at the hip” and not the funny-bone. Raised in a Queens mansion, Trump remains an outsider in Manhattan, an unwelcome, parvenu. Yet the polite titters and Bronx cheers he receives are unprecedented, if not shockingly un-Australian.

When Trump proceeds to assert – “Germany will become totally dependent on Russian energy …” he draws a similar response. Germany’s delegation laughs and snickers. But it’s sacrilege to us fair dinkum, down-under allies.

We must suck up to Trump, our Siamese twin, culturally, economically, politically; ape America’s decadence and double-speak, fawn over its hypocritical “rules based world order”; just as we cheered its illicit attacks on a base in Syria in 2017 and its three further, more expansive strikes on what it claims were chemical weapons sites in 2018.

How we eagerly joined its illegal 2003 invasion of Iraq. PM Howard only had to pretend he had legal authority . Few brave our patriotic press to explain that the failed invasions have created a refugee crisis, let alone colossal human suffering, which we have no hope of dealing with. Perhaps guilt helps fuel our anti-refugee hysteria.

As obsequious, fawning lickspittles we help normalise Agent Orange, as Trump is sometimes known.

And we love a stoush. A frisson of anticipation runs round our island nation’s high command at the merest hint of a role to play in invading North Korea, Syria or Iran or wherever the flower of democracy must next be tenderly preserved. As the needs of the military-industrial complex, as Eisenhower warned in 1961, demand.

Imagine, as Orwell puts it, whenever you think of the future, a boot stamping on a human face forever.

We’ve just put our hands up to join a NATO-led mission in Iraq “to improve the country’s military academies”. How else to stop the return of ISIS or a resurgence of terrorism? We’ll “train the trainers” who’ll teach Iraqi soldiers how to counter suicide bombers and detect, defuse and dispose of terrorists’ improvised explosives.

At least that’s the official spin, loyally and faithfully reproduced by Fairfax and our ABC over the last five years.

The Donald may be a joke to the rest of the world. But not us. We are remaking our politics in his own image. It’s not just how we’ve taken to fake news increasingly found in Murdoch tabloids and Sky after Dark. Even our ABC dare not put a foot out line in singing the praises of the wisdom of toxic, expensive, coal-fired baseload power.

Think Great Barrier Reef Foundation where we tip a bucket of money over a group of fossil fuel executives, coal lobbyists and other climate change deniers. We have to give them $444,000, to meet UN requirements regarding deadlines set for spending and amounts to keep the reef registered on the world heritage list. The chief advocate for this decision has gone on to knife his PM and wear a Trump-like cap.

Our own unelected PM, Scott Mad Max Morrison is so utterly converted to Trumpism that he’s taken to wearing baseball caps – all that’s missing is the MAGA logo.  Or is it? A closer look at the UN laugh-in is instructive. The rest of the world is less prepared to pretend that the emperor wears new clothes. The worm may be turning.

Deluded narcissist, monster-baby and first US President from Russia with love, Trump takes his Fox-populist Neocon shtick on the road, Tuesday, only to have United Nations General Assembly delegates, laugh at his own trumpet-blowing; chutzpah solo, the hollowest boast UN members have ever heard from any president.

And the most far-fetched fantasy. “In less than two years, my administration has accomplished more than almost any administration in the history of our country.”

Delegates laugh at the leader of the free world. Fifty-five per cent of the UN’s 193 members represent dictatorships – or in UN double-speak “not fully-fledged democracies” evoking Dryden’s nod to Aristotle’s view of man as an unfeathered two-legged thing. Tyranny and despotism are equally plucked; featherless.

But vital to all democracies is a free press. Some of these even have a proudly independent national broadcaster free from political interference. And they’ve cut away the dead albatross; the decay corpse of neoliberalism from around their necks leaving them to invest in schools and hospitals not the service delivery of privatised and outsourced health care and educational options. And banks set up not to profit out of need and vulnerability but to supply the funds to develop a civil society.

*David Tyler (AKA Urban Wronski) was born in England, raised in New Zealand and an Australian resident since 1979. Urban Wronski grew up conflicted about his own national identity and continues to be deeply mistrustful of all nationalism, chauvinism, flags, politicians and everything else which divides and obscures our common humanity. He has always been enchanted by nature and by the extraordinary brilliance of ordinary men and women and the genius, the power and the poetry that is their vernacular. Wronski is now a fulltime freelance writer who lives with his partner and editor Shay and their chooks, near the Grampians in rural Victoria and he counts himself the luckiest man alive. A former teacher of all ages and stages, from Tertiary to Primary, for nearly forty years, he enjoyed contesting the corporatisation of schooling to follow his own natural instinct for undifferentiated affection, approval and compassion for the young.</i>

12 Comments

12 Comments

  1. TGC

    October 1, 2018 at 8:39 am

    Refreshed (new) Site- same old Wronski!

    • max

      October 2, 2018 at 9:10 am

      Refreshed (new) Site- same old Wronski!, pity it is still the same old TGC

  2. Chris

    October 1, 2018 at 9:06 am

    Sound familiar?
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZ_Kbiwl2ok?

    Nothing changes, The talking Toilet Brush is a prominent member, who appoints who he likes and donates to Foxtel our $30 million for their purposes.

    PS.
    Love the new Times.

  3. max

    October 2, 2018 at 9:05 am

    The last paragraph says it all. We had the chance and blew it. We sold our bank, sold our electric utilities and sold out our workers with free trade. Our politicians pat themselves on the back for destroying what could have been utopia. Our self congratulating so called world’s best treasurers sold the farm for a pittance. Our mineral wealth legacy will be a hole in the ground instead of the once in a life time opportunity it could have been.

  4. davies

    October 2, 2018 at 2:17 pm

    “But vital to all democracies is a free press. Some of these even have a proudly independent national broadcaster free from political interference. And they’ve cut away the dead albatross; the decay corpse of neoliberalism from around their necks leaving them to invest in schools and hospitals not the service delivery of privatised and outsourced health care and educational options. And banks set up not to profit out of need and vulnerability but to supply the funds to develop a civil society.”

    And the shining examples of this socialist utopia are…Venezuala???

  5. Keith Antonysen

    October 3, 2018 at 1:58 pm

    When embarrassing matters crop up for the LNP, Morrison’s response is we are concerned about the future, or words to that effect.
    It had been a Parliamentary Joint Committee unanimously supported by the LNP that had questioned the terrible situation that the financial industry was in. The full committee agreed that serious rorts were happening. Then, along comes Abbott, nothing is done; by the time Turnbull comes on the scene there is denial that any action needs to happen against financial institutions. Abbott on becoming “PM” sought to deregulate a myriad of areas, mess the already indentified financial area was in was proof that de-regulation doesn’t work.

    Neo-Liberalism, Libertarianism, and Neo-Conservatism have been having a greater influence on countries as time goes on. The levels of homelessness, suicide, and poverty are increasing in Western Countries; while, Corporate profits are soaring. So while Venezuela might have troubles, it is not as though Western countries are having a clear run.

    On climate change, Morrison is continuing with the farce they call policy. An obscure US Agency has just published that we are no longer able to control climate change. It is no reason to give up as the Secretary General of the United Nations states we have a couple of years to make real efforts to thwart the worst of climate change.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/trump-administration-sees-a-7-degree-rise-in-global-temperatures-by-2100/2018/09/27/b9c6fada-bb45-11e8-bdc0-90f81cc58c5d_story.html?utm_term=.c97171fc581a

    The New Daily has commented on the attitude of Morrison in relation to climate change .. https://thenewdaily.com.au/money/finance-news/2018/10/02/scott-morrison-carbon-emissions-claim-not-true/

    We have had a change of leader, and still no trust can be accorded to the PM.

    If true this should be a prime concern:

    https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/now-the-police-want-your-passwords-–-and-you-could-be-fined-dollar60000-or-put-in-prison-for-five-years-if-you-refuse/ar-BBNBzP6?ocid=sf

  6. max

    October 4, 2018 at 9:23 am

    And the shining examples of this socialist utopia are…Venezuala???”
    With over 300 million barrels of proven reserves, Venezuela has the largest amount of proven oil reserves in the world.
    It would appear on global events that if you have oil and want to benefit your country with what should belong to the people, you are in trouble if you refuse to give it away.
    Saddam Hussein and his country paid the ultimate price.

  7. davies

    October 4, 2018 at 10:49 am

    “Neo-Liberalism, Libertarianism, and Neo-Conservatism have been having a greater influence on countries as time goes on. The levels of homelessness, suicide, and poverty are increasing in Western Countries; while, Corporate profits are soaring. So while Venezuela might have troubles, it is not as though Western countries are having a clear run.”

    So I am still waiting for this mythical well run socialist country talked about. Surely we got several examples? Don’t be shy.

    But I did get a response suggesting Venezuela might have troubles but western countries are too…

    Let’s look at the ‘might be troubles’ in Venezuela. Just a couple of facts to start off with.

    The National Assembly at the end of July 2018 estimate that six children are dying of starvation every week. SIX CHILDREN DYING EVERY WEEK. 87% of Venezuelan households are classified as POOR. Around 90% cannot afford food. The average weight loss for the majority of the adult population is around 11kg.

    It seems Socialism is great, unless of course you like food!

    Inflation is around 46,000% per annum. When Chavez got in 2-3 Bolivars could buy 1 US dollar. Now it is in the hundreds of thousands.

    In recent years 4 million people have fled this socialist regime. That is closing on 15% of the population. And how many more would leave if they were allowed to?

    Now compare that humanitarian and economic disaster with the troubles of western countries.

    It is utterly shameful to try and downplay the socialist disaster in Venezuela.

    • max.

      October 4, 2018 at 3:09 pm

      Neo-Liberalism, Libertarianism, and Neo-Conservatism have been having a greater influence on countries as time goes on. The levels of homelessness, suicide, and poverty are increasing in Western Countries; while, Corporate profits are soaring.
      neo-liberalism is associated with greater poverty and income inequalities, and greater health inequalities within nations. Furthermore, countries with Social Democratic forms of welfare regimes, those that are less neo-liberal) have better health and welfare.
      The Liberal Party is now entirely unmoored from economic ideology, swamped by the electoral reaction to neoliberalism
      Social Democratic countries are plentiful. Norway,Denmark and Finland are just a few. Venezuela is striving to be a Social Democratic country against the might of America
      The real target of current US threats and provocative actions against Venezuela, is to secure the oil fields for the US big oil cartel.
      China’s Development Bank has approved a US$5-billion loan for Venezuela’s oil industry. This may well put the cat in with pigeons.

  8. davies

    October 4, 2018 at 5:05 pm

    The US Government are to blame for Venezuela’s current nightmare??? So Obama and Hillary Clinton must have played a key role for eight of those years. So according to your conspiracy theory, we can pin the blame of 6 children dying every week from starvation (and this is one of the most horrible ways to die) on Obama and Hillary!!! The BASTARDS!

    Of course Occam’s Razor would suggest the most likely explanation is true. And the most likely explanation is the total mismanagement and corruption from the socialist government of Chavez and co.

    You haven’t been paying attention. The $5B loan from China is just the latest loan from them. Venezuela has a $70B debt to China. The oil fields belong to China.

    And just going back to your conspiracy theory, didn’t Norway effectively nationalise it’s oil fields for the benefit of it’s people? Why didn’t they pay the ultimate price? But Saddam Hussein did pay the ultimate price because he was using the oil for the people’s benefit? Funny, Saddam’s magnificent largesse and generosity is rarely mentioned (except of course in his official autobiography).

    Mind you in comparison with Chavez and co he does look like a bit of saint…

    As for the Nordic countries and how their social democratic structures are a successful role model for Australia to follow. Are you aware of their history? Are you aware of their economic/tax structures? Are you aware of the direction they are heading in way of taxation etc.?

    Here are a few facts to get you thinking:

    Nordic countries are leaders in economic freedom index (Heritage) and ease of doing business according to the World Bank

    Private property is guaranteed by law and citizens’ savings are fully private and free of government control.

    All Nordic countries have been lowering the tax wedge and have way lower corporate tax rates to us. For example Sweden is 22%, Norway 24% and Finland 20%. They all followed similar approaches. Between 1981 and 2018 the average corporate rate in Finland was 34%. The maximum rate was in 1982 at 61%. In 2014 they dropped it to 20%.

    The Nordic states do not dictate or impose schooling and healthcare (most have co-payment schemes). It simply administers and promotes choice between private and state-run services. Private education is encouraged through school vouchers

    They tend to be leaders private banking, attracting capital, guaranteeing legal security and private investment.

    They have privatised inefficient state-owned entities successfully from telecommunications, electricity generation and distribution. Even postal services and some forests have been privatised.

    They have some of the most flexible labour markets in the world. Norway for example has no minimum wage. There is little impediments to sacking and hiring staff.

    I am more than happy to try out the Nordic model because in many ways it is more pro-capitalist than us. They are not the social democratic countries you think they are. That ‘model’ died when their financial crisis hit in the 1980s/1990s.

  9. Keith Antonysen

    October 4, 2018 at 5:29 pm

    Davies, you are generalising the particular to the general in relation to Venezuela, a logical fallacy. Thousands of people have died through climate change; yet, in the past you have argued from a denier point of view.
    Young refugees under 10 years of age under the auspices of the Australian government are making attempts to commit suicide and are not obtaining appropriate medical or psychiatric care.
    Western Nations are involved in bombing innocent men, women, and children in Middle Eastern countries.
    In the US there is an under class virtually living the lives of third world impoverished people.
    Scandanavian countries are generally fairing well; they would seem to be running along socialist lines.

    Not acting on climate change has been described as the crime of the epoch.

    Man’s inhumanity to man is a theme that runs through many countries, it runs across a number of political ideologies.
    The extreme right wing Pinochet regime had people disappear.
    Why not mention Yemen and Palestine?

  10. max

    October 5, 2018 at 10:12 am

    If you look at all the recent wars, invasions, and “humanitarian interventions” that have resulted in collapsed countries and anarchy across whole regions, it is clear that beyond oil and gas the key issue is money, the Petro Dollar.Iraq tried to in euro not dollars and Saddam Hussein was deposed; despite being welcomed briefly back into the international fold, once Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi began to talk about establishing the African gold dinar a currency, backed by Libya’s oil wealth to challenge the petrodollar, he too was toppled; Assad wanted to facilitate energy pipe lines to Europe for Russia and Iran, and he was attacked; even Iran tried to trade its energy reserves in euro and it was almost invaded in 2008; Russia itself trades some of its energy in rubles and finally there is Venezuela and China
    As people say, always follow the money.
    Americas whole economy depends on the petro dollar and is fighting a no holds barred war.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top