Yes, after 13 years of low rainfall events now the farming community is complaining about the higher levels of rainfall.
Well farmers, and others, as you destabilize the climate the parameters of the climate widen. Wetter years, bigger storm events, more frequent floods, floods at or breaking records, hotter summers, warmer winters longer droughts greater evaporative losses and all the associated impacts on crops follow.
Will a 5% reduction on 2000 levels of Carbon emissions by 2020 cut it?
As the Climate Change Commission tours the country trying to convince people incapable of grasping the overwhelming evidence that the climate is changing and wishing to argue the completely unsustainable from ill informed positions, the on ground evidence for increasing climate instability grows and grows, along with the changes in the environment that have been forecast from modelling of the climate caused by higher concentrations of CO2 caused by humans burning fossil fuels and destroying forests.
Once positive feedbacks gain momentum it will not matter what the BRIC group [Brazil, Russia, India, China] of countries do, their presumed level of activity used as an excuse for Australian inaction, the temperatures at which the climate stability that has allowed human activity to rise to its current degree of complexity will be gone for at least a millennia, taking with it the current systems that regulate atmospheric CO2.
What will those effectively denying the need for action by opposing a price on Carbon say then?.
It was all the fault of ….., I am really sorry for ….., Gee if I had only known…..?
Well the evidence is there for all to read, if they could be bothered. Idiot shock jocks, irresponsible politicians seeking office, members of Paul Kelly’s outsiders who are willing to follow because its easier to believe than find out for themselves. These are now the people responsible for the rate of change and ultimately the climate outcome. These are now the people responsible for the costs and deaths associated with that outcome. These are the people who are creating the legacy for the children they supposedly cherish.
Russian Boreal Forests Undergoing Vegetation Change, Study Shows:
ScienceDaily (Mar. 25, 2011) — Russia’s boreal forest — the largest continuous expanse of forest in the world, found in the country’s cold northern regions — is undergoing an accelerating large-scale shift in vegetation types as a result of globally and regionally warming climate. That in turn is creating an even warmer climate in the region, according to a new study published in the journal Global Change Biology and highlighted in the April issue of Nature Climate Change.
The Great Russian forest, which includes much of Siberia, is the size of the contiguous United States. It has experienced significant documented warming over the last several decades. As a result, tree species that are more tolerant of warmer weather are advancing northward at an increasing rate as species that are less tolerant to a warmer climate are declining in number.
“We’ve identified that the boreal forest, particularly in Siberia, is converting from predominantly needle-shedding larch trees to evergreen conifers in response to warming climate,” said the study’s lead author, Jacquelyn Shuman, a post-doctoral research associate in environmental sciences in University of Virginia’s Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. “This will promote additional warming and vegetation change, particularly in areas with low species diversity.”
Larch trees drop their needles in the fall, allowing the vast snow-covered ground surface of winter to reflect sunlight and heat back into space. This helps keep the climate in the region very cold. But evergreen conifers, such as spruce and fur, retain their needles year round. These trees absorb sunlight, which causes ground-level heat retention. This creates ideal conditions for the proliferation of evergreens, to the detriment of the leaf-dropping larches. The result is a northward progression of evergreens and a farther-northward retreat by the larch forests.
“What we’re seeing is a system kicking into overdrive,” said co-author Hank Shugart, a U.Va. professor of environmental sciences. “Warming creates more warming.”
The researchers used a climate model to assess what would happen if evergreens continued to expand their range farther north and larch species declined. The “positive feedback” cycle of warming promoting warming showed an increase of absorbed surface warming. The model takes into account detailed information about tree growth rates, and the results agree with actual field studies documenting changes in cone production and movement of evergreen treelines northward.
“Such changes in that vast region have the potential to affect areas outside of the region,” Shuman noted.
The Russian boreal forest sits over a tremendous repository of carbon-rich soil frozen in the permafrost. As the forest changes in species distribution from larch to evergreens, warming of the ground surface would cause decomposition of the soil, releasing huge quantities of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere — possibly as much as 15 percent of the carbon dioxide currently in the atmosphere.
“This is not the scenario one would want to see,” Shugart said. “It potentially would increase warming on a global scale.”
The study is derived from Shuman’s Ph.D. dissertation. Shugart served as her adviser. Their paper is co-authored by Thomas Liam O’Halloran, previously a doctoral student in environmental sciences at U.Va. and now a post-doctoral research associate at Oregon State University.
Shuman and Shugart recently received a $987,000, three-year grant from NASA to continue their studies.