Tasmanian Times

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. No price is too high for the privilege of owning yourself. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche

The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. If you try it, you will be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. No price is too high for the privilege of owning yourself. ~ Friedrich Nietzsche

Environment

They arrest angels in Tasmania

David Leser Vanity Fair. English version of an article published in the Italian edition of Vanity Fair a week ago.

In September last year, one week after police had issued their claim against Beltran, her partner, Ben Morrow, was diagnosed with bowel cancer. Doctors informed him the cancer was at an advanced stage and had spread throughout his abdomen. At the time of writing the managing director of Gunns Limited, John Gay, was showing no signs of withdrawing the company’s claim for damages against Morrow – despite his illness – nor of answering questions Vanity Fair wanted to put to him. “Mr Gay is not doing interviews at the moment with any media,” said his personal assistant. Asked why that was, his assistant replied:“Because he doesn’t want to. And that’s his prerogative.” Nor was the Premier of Tasmania, Paul Lennon, available – when asked at short notice – to comment for this article.
image

THEY ARREST angels in Tasmania.

They don’t just clip their wings. They haul them out of trees, march them off to court, then charge them for being just that. Angels. Then they sue the lovers of these angels, even when they’re dying.

Down here at the bottom of the world, on the edge of the Great Southern Ocean, in this place of great beauty and slaughter, they do things that tip over into the realms of myth. They arrest angels, kill giants, bring down monarchs, poison the earth and sea. They even threaten grandmothers.

But let’s start with the angels. This one’s name is Allana Beltran and two years ago she walked into the lower Weld Valley in Tasmania’s southern forests and experienced what can only be described as a life-changing epiphany. In front of her was a wilderness of ancient, towering trees, deep gorges and waterfalls, and a wild river flowing through it. On an adjacent ridge there was a different scene. It was the blackened ruins of a recently clearfelled tract of native forest.

“It was the most horrific devastation of land I had ever seen in my life,” the visual artist from Sydney told Vanity Fair recently. “And from that moment on my heart was with the people who were standing up for places like this.”

Allana Beltran decided to stay in these forests and join the group of protesters trying to save it from further logging. That’s when she met Ben Morrow, the man who would soon become her partner. He’d been in the valley for six months, much of it spent 50 to 60 metres up in a grey-trunked eucalypt, in what’s called a `tree-sit,’ on the lookout for loggers.

“Our camp was in the middle of the road that changed from clearfell to wilderness,” Beltran says now from her home in the Tasmanian capital of Hobart. “There was 100 ha of clearfelling and they wanted to bulldoze a road another two and a half kilometres in so they could access 2000 ha. This was all old growth forest surrounded by World Heritage Area.”

In November 2006 the camp was raided by police as the logging company moved into build the new stretch of road. Twenty-five protesters were arrested. By March, the beginning of the Australian autumn, the blockade had virtually collapsed with only three protesters left standing between the chainsaws and the forests.

Although not exactly standing. One man was locked onto the gate at one of the entrances to the forest. Another man, Ben Morrow, was hanging in a sling off the bridge over the Weld River. Seven kilometres from him, Alanna Beltran was attached to a giant tripod at a second entrance to the forest. She had a long white curtain wrapped around her waist, white body paint on her face and was wearing wings of white cockatoo feathers that she’d scavanged from the shorelines and forest floor. She’d become the “Weld Angel,” the “Angel of the Forest,” and her haunting image was about to enter Tasmanian folklore.

“I did it because I thought it would look beautiful,” she says now matter-of-factly, “and if I was going to be arrested as a visual artist, I wanted to make a visual statement.”

Beltran sat in her forest aerie for nine and a half hours listening through headphones to Tibetan monk music, as the police ordered her down through megaphones. “I was praying for the forests and for people to realise what they are doing. I was ready to sacrifice myself to this cause. I was ready to stand up for these ancient forests.”

image

This is a story for our times. It may be unfolding in one of the remotest parts of the globe – the sixth and smallest state of Australia – but it is a story that has resonance everywhere. It is about the power that monopoly companies can – and do – wield over governments and people. It is about democracy and ethics and about the value people place on the things they love. It is about old ways of doing business and new ways of paying respect to the land.

In this case it is about the forests of Tasmania and the battle to save them from destruction. On an island roughly the size of the Netherlands and Belgium combined there is an average of 15,000 ha of native forest being logged each year, according to the Wilderness Sociey, although the Tasmanian Government insists the figure has fallen to 11,000. Either way, at the very least, that’s 30 football fields every day.

And these are not just any forests.These are, in some instances, the tallest hardwood trees in the world, the last of the mighty Mountain Ash, or Eucalyptus regnans, which are found in the Styx Valley – or Valley of the Giants – two hours drive west of Hobart.

There are trees in here as high as 97 metres, as old as 400 years; and where the fall of one can send a shudder through the earth and provide enough timber to build a hamlet of homes. They are nesting places for the rare and endangered wedgetailed eagle, white goshawks and pink rainforest robins. They are a link to adjoining World Heritage Areas and a vital carbon sink for a world threatened by global warming.

And yet in Tasmania nearly 90 per cent of these eucalypt kings are believed to have been destroyed, much of it sold by the Tasmanian Government to a company called Gunns Limited – the largest logging company in Australia. Gunns buys the trees for between A$12 and $15 ( 7 and 9 euros) a tonne, and then on-sells this as woodchip to Japanese paper companies for ten times that amount.

What is left behind from these rare ecosystems is often a wasteland of smoking ash caused by the practice of clearfelling, which involves levelling the forest with bulldozers, chainsaws and cable-logging rigs, torching the earth with incendiary devices dropped from helicopters, and then, in most cases, turning the land over to monocultural plantations.

And this is happening all over the island, much to the horror of many Tasmanians and, judging by the opinion polls, the majority of Australians, although Forestry Tasmania, the government-run business enterprise that manages forests and contracts the loggers, disputes this. “Forty-four per cent of the total land in Tasmania is reserved,” says Ken Jeffreys, the organisation’s general manager of corporate relations. “And on (state-owned) land we have 1.5 million ha – 250,000 ha of which is old growth forest that is reserved forever.”

Environmentalists counter that a large amount of this reserved area is commercially useless to the forestry industry and that what is commercially valuable is inadequately protected. “Less than half the original forests are left,” the Tasmanian Green Party’s Senator Bob Brown tells Vanity Fair in an interview in Hobart. “And they are going at a rate unprecedented in history. These are world heritage valued forests being chainsawed off the face of the earth, never to return.”

Dr Bob Brown is a hero to the Australian environment movement, and has been for the past 30 years. It would be fair to say there is no one remotely like him in Australian politics, nor probably in any other Western democracy. Son of a policeman Brown is the first openly gay politician in Australian national politics.

More like a prophet-saint figure than a doctor-turned politician, in 1976 he staged a one-man hunger strike for more than a week on the icy slopes of Mt Wellington, overlooking Hobart, to protest the arrival of an American nuclear-armed warship into the harbour. In the early 1980s, as head of the Tasmanian Wilderness Society, he spent 19 days in prison for trying to stop – peacefully – the Tasmanian Government’s plans to dam the mighty Franklin River in central Tasmania. (Three years earlier his book on this ancient river system had been launched by the world famous violinst and conductor, Sir Yehudi Menuhin.)

The day after Brown’s release from prison he was elected to the Tasmanian parliament as an independent. Thirteen years later he was elected to the national Senate, as a representative of the Tasmanian Green Party, an offshoot of the United Tasmania Group which, in the early 1970s, became the world’s first Green political party.

Bob Brown is as crazy-brave and passionate as they come in political life. In October 2003 he made international headlines when he interrupted a speech to a joint sitting of the parliament by US President George W. Bush. Brown wanted to draw attention to the incarceration of two Australians being held without charge at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. He also wanted to make the point that international law was being violated in Iraq. “Respect the laws of the world and the world will respect you,” he admonished the American president, causing widespread commotion and, later, ostracicsm by many of his fellow parliamentarians.

Political stunts aside, though, it was – and is – the forests of Tasmania that have always been closest to Bob Brown’s heart. During the past 25 years he has been arrested, abused, threatened, beaten, shot at by logging vigilantes incensed over his efforts to save Tasmania’s wilderness areas. He has also had his mailbox destroyed on at least 17 occasions, sometimes filled with dead possums and rabbit guts.

In 2004 Brown, together with 19 others, received a 216 page, 3.8 million euro claim from Gunns charging him with conspiring to destroy the company’s profits – estimated at nearly 50 million euros last year. (Brown has since been dropped from the action.)

Among those being sued – they’ve become known as the Gunns 20 – was a penniless grandmother protesting the logging of her valley, a doctor who’d been raising public health awareness about woodchip piles, the country’s leading wilderness organisation, a film-maker and several protesters, including Ben Morrow, who was arrested earlier in the year for climbing aboard a woodchip loader as a Japanese ship was being filled with shredded forest.

“The perversity of the (legal) action was staggering,” wrote “Richard Flanagan, the internationally-acclaimed Tasmanian author, in an article published first in London’s Daily Telegraph. “With the immense fortune it had made out of destroying Tasmania’s forests, Gunns had launched an action that would, if successful, have redefined the practice of democracy as the crime of conspiracy.

“An Australian would not have been able to criticise, question or campaign against a corporation, for risk of being bankrupted in legal proceedings brought against them by the richest and most powerful in their society, claiming damage to their corporate interest. No matter how a corporation made its money, be it from tobacco or asbestos or chemicals, all of its actions would have effectively been removed from the realm of public life.”

Richard Flanagan is considered by many to be the social and political conscience of his island home. A man who speaks like a bush poet and writes like a dream, he is, in the red-neck world of Tasmanian politics, Enemy Number One. In April 2004 the then Minister for Forests, Bryan Green, famously described Flanagan as a traitor for daring to question the cosy relationshp that had existed previously between the late Premier of Tasmania, Jim Bacon, and the logging giant, Gunns Limited. Bacon’s successor as Tasmanian leader, Paul Lennon later remarked that neither Flanagan nor his writings were welcome “in the New Tasmania.”

Flanagan didn’t win any further favour when he told his international audience – a fact already known to his fellow Australians – that Lennon was seeing to fast track approval for a Gunns pulp mill at the very time he was using a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gunns to renovate his colonial home•. And this when the company was not normally involved in the business of home renovation.

“This is a third world story – like the United Fruit Company (in Guatemala in the 1950s),” he tells Vanity Fair, “where there is one company run for greed, that now gives the appearance of owning everything that matters on this island, including – it seems to many Tasmanians – the politicans. And no one will take them on.”

image

Tasmania has long been a land of conflict and sorrow – to both the white man and black. A one-time jail for petty thieves and misbegotten souls shipped from England, Ireland and Scotland in the early 19th century, it also became a place of annihilation for the island’s original inhabitants.

Estimated at between 5 and 10,000 at the time of British settlement in 1803, by 1850 Tasmania’s indigenous people had come close to being wiped out by what was described at the time as a “war of extermination.’ The last full-blooded Aborigine, Truganini, was immortalised more than a century later in a song by one of Australia’s most famous rock bands, Midnight Oil.

I hear much support for the monarchy
I hear the Union Jack’s to remain
I see Namatjira in custody
I see Truganini’s in chains

The singer of this political anthem was the hulking, bald-headed figure of Peter Garrett, now the Australian Minister for the Environment. Having been appointed to the position after the crushing November 2007 defeat of the conservative Howard government, Garrett found himself charged with deciding what to do about Gunns’ proposal for one of the largest pulp mills in the world.

Two days after issuing its law suit against the so-called “Gunns 20” the company announced plans for an 850 million euro pulp mill in the pristine Tamar Valley in the north of the island – just 36 kilometres from Launceston, the second city of Tasmania.

The proposal caused a firestorm in Australian politics. The Tamar Valley has a population of around 100,000 and is a slice of Arcadia on the edge of the world. It is filled with dairy farms, vineyards, beautiful beaches, a languid river and flanked by snow-capped mountains. According to one study the effects of the pulp mill – on the tourism, wine and organic food industy alone – would be in the order of 1.8 billion euros. And that’s not taking into account the further destruction of forests to the north and north-west of the valley.

“They are going to stick the world’s biggest pulp mill in here,” says Bob Brown, “one that will exude millions of tonnes of greenhouse gas into the air, with a sewer pipe running into the ocean creating cancer-causing dioxins which will eventually end up in penguins in Antarctica.

“And the forests being targetted to be fed into the pulp mill will create profits for the Sydney Stock Exchange and not Tasmania, because neither the pulp nor the profits will stay in Tasmania.”

And therein lies another cautionary tale. While Gunns’ profits have soared in recent years to record levels, they have done so at the expense of the taxpayer. Despite owning 85 per cent of the state’s logging industry, Gunns has paid only limited royalties to Forestry Tasmania, the government-run enterprise charged with obtaining commercial returns on publicly-owned native forests.

Furthermore, the company has been granted massive tax concessions on private land – land that was once native forest and has been clearfelled for plantation timber. And this coupled with the loss of an estimated 1200 jobs in the Tasmanian forestry industry in the past 10 years.

In a woodchip-flooded market, old growth logging is estimated to employ – according to the Forestry Industry’s own 2004 report – 1345 people on an island of half a million. And that figure was published before a wave of further job losses.

“This is an industry as driven by ideological bailouts and hidden subsidies as a Soviet-era pig-iron foundry,” says Flanagan. “Worse still, at the moment when Tasmania is acquiring a global reputation as an island of exceptional beauty, the forces that would destroy much of the island’s unique nature have been unleashed.”

Tasmanian poet and essayist, Dr Peter Hay, echoes these sentiments. In an interview with Vanity Fair overlooking the entrance to Hobart’s polar blue harbour, he says: “The heart and soul of this island lives in the forests. When you go into a cleafell you can’t even conceive of anyone wanting to visit such brutality on the land. To rip such a complex fabric apart shows a profound contempt and disrespect.”

image

In 1817 the French writer Stendahl entered Florence for the first time and became so overwhelmed with the cultural richness of the city, particularly the beauty of Giotto’s famous frescoes, that he almost fainted.

I now know how he felt. On a mild Australian summer’s morning in early 2008 I entered the Styx Valley in southern Tasmania for the first time with my guide, Vica Bayley, from the Wilderness Society.

I, too, nearly fell over with wonderment.

Here was a prehistoric wilderness of eucalyptus regnans, the tallest hardwood trees in the world, towering above a forest floor blanketed in bracken and soft ferns. In front of me, the mighty “Gandalf’s Staff,” soaring 84.5 metres into the sky, with a girth roughly the size of a cliff face.

Throughout 2003-4 this patch of pristine rainforest was the scene of a remarkable international protest. Having been earmarked for destruction, activists had gathered from around the world to establish the “Global Rescue Station” – a treesit suspended 65 metres off the ground attached to Gandalf’s Staff. Ben Morrow was one of the protesters taking part. “It was a beautiful place to live,” he recalls now. “I was there for about eight months and at one time I slept on a platform 75 metres off the ground. (At the time the tallest tree-sit in the world.). I had black cockatoos flying around me.”

The campaign to save this wilderness area proved successful, but in valley after valley throughout Tasmania’s south-western wilderness, indeed throughout the island – in the north and north-east, over in the west – the logging of ancient forests of world heritage value has continued at feverish pace.

Not far from Gandalf’s Staff – and the aptly-named “Tolkien Track” – Vanity Fair witnessed a landscape of charred and limbless trees stretching in every direction – the result of a recent clearfelling operation. Scenes of devastation like this are to be found all over the island.

In fact as you read this, the blue autumnal skies will soon be turning to grime as clearfelling operations resume. In the Upper Florentine Valley, just north of the Styx, a mosaic of ancient rainforest – giant eucalypts, myrtles and sassafras – stands under sentence of death. Activisits remain on red-alert. “We’re not leaving here until we’ve saved this place,” one of them told me after having climbed down from his 50 metre-high sentry-watch.

Meanwhile families turn in on each other as the cancer eats into the fabric of society. In the town of Maydena, 60 kms north-west of Hobart, Prudence Barratt, explains how the logging of the valleys – once the home of the Tasmanian Tiger – has divided her family. For four generations the Barratt men were employed in forestry, as surveyors, tree-fellers, carpenter-builders. Now Prudence has decided no more. She wants to dedicate her life to saving the trees, despite what her brother thinks.

“He came here and abused me. `You stinking, fucking, greenie,’ he said. So I’ve kind of walked away from that relationship.”

Prudence has been threatenend on a number of occasions, once by a man wielding a machete, another by a man pointing a .22 rifle at her. It is not uncommon for loggers to drive by her house, yelling: “Greenie bitch. Greenie slut.”

Last year she was allegedly assaulted by police and taken to hospital because of her injuries. Next month (March) she will appear in the Supreme Court on charges of trespassing. She remains undeterred. “These forests mean the world to me. They are part of my heritage.”

image

Six months after being arrested as an angel in the Weld Valley, Allana Beltran was handed a claim for nearly A$10,000 (more than 6000 euros) by Tasmanian Police and Forestry Tasmania. Part of the claim was for lost police wages during the time she’d been protesting, and for the cost of their lunches and coffee.

Beltran had earlier in the year pleaded guilty to committing a nuisance and failing to obey a police instruction, a plea for which she’d been placed on a 12 month good behaviour bond and told not to re-enter the Weld Valley.

Here, now, was another penalty, this time financial, for the crime of peaceful protest. There was uproar in Tasmanian politics. “Forestry Tasmania should leave the Weld Angel alone,” said the Tasmanian Green’s Opposite Leader, Peg Putt. “It undermines our democracy to specifically target one group in society for additional penalties because of their political views.”

The police eventually backed down after legal advice found their claim “not well founded in law.” However Forestry Tasmania has vowed to continue its claim, while reducing the amount to A$2000 (1200 euros). (Latest: Costs bid against Angel thrown out )
“Alanna Beltran wasn’t protesting the logging of old growth forests,” Forestry Tasmania’s Ken Jeffreys tells Vanity Fair . “She was on a road leading to one of our major tourist attractions, surrounded by re-growth forest. She was stopping people from entering a major tourist attraction. Besides which, not one cent will come out of her pocket. It will all be paid by the environemental group she belongs to.”

In September last year, one week after police had issued their claim against Beltran, her partner, Ben Morrow, was diagnosed with bowel cancer. Doctors informed him the cancer was at an advanced stage and had spread throughout his abdomen.

At the time of writing the managing director of Gunns Limited, John Gay, was showing no signs of withdrawing the company’s claim for damages against Morrow – despite his illness – nor of answering questions Vanity Fair wanted to put to him.

“Mr Gay is not doing interviews at the moment with any media,” said his personal assistant.

Asked why that was, his assistant replied:“Because he doesn’t want to. And that’s his prerogative.”

Nor was the Premier of Tasmania, Paul Lennon, available – when asked at short notice – to comment for this article.

image

In November last year, a new Labor government was swept into power in Australia after 11 years of conservative rule, a period which saw Australia seemingly frozen in time on the question of climate change. One of the newly-elected government’s first pledges was to reverse the country’s long-standing refusal to sign the Kyoto Protocol and to embrace a carbon trading system along with binding emission reductions.

At the United Nations-led climate change conference in Bali a month later the Australian delegation received rapturous applause when it announced that, finally, the country was at one with the international community on its efforts to combat global warming.

Now the real test is being applied at home in relation to the forests of Tasmania. “What is Kevin Rudd (the new Australian Prime Minister) going to do about this?” Bob Brown demands. “Here are the biggest carbon banks in the world being demolished in a world facing climate change catastrophe. Peter Garrett (his Environment Minister) should immediately block the pulp mill and end the logging of native forests across Australia.

“It is very, very tough to think that if, in Tasmania, we can’t stop this calamity and violation of the earth, then we can’t ask people in Brazil and Indonesia and Equatorial Africa to do it. We are done for if we don’t stand up to it.”

And that’s the question many Australians are now asking themselves. Who amongst us is on the side of the angels?

•On Tasmanian Times, the renovations saga: Good morning Mr Lennon

Earlier: The Angel of History

image

Author Credits: [show_post_categories parent="no" parentcategory="writers" show = "category" hyperlink="yes"]
26 Comments

26 Comments

  1. almajuntek

    March 5, 2010 at 3:37 pm

    I was 18 – true. I was young – of course. I had sex only with one boy by that time (another story). She was 8 years older than me – so what. All I knew was she made me feel safe and for the lack of a better term, loved.

    As our silent dance continued, she began to gently rub my back, starting in the middle where my dress covered me slowly working her way upward. I trembled the first time I felt her fingers dance across my skin. When she reached the top of my back, just at the base of my neck a change shot through me. I was all of a sudden no longer shaking with nerves.

  2. Acibre

    February 11, 2010 at 7:03 am

    я так считаю: благодарю.

    база данных номеров мегафон: база данных номеров сотовых телефонов
    поиск улицы по номеру телефона: поиск улицы по номеру телефона
    в Оренбурге сотовая телефонная база данных – мобильная телефонная база данных
    поиск людей по фамилии германия – поиск людей по телефонному номеру
    мой мир ру поиск людей Щёлково: мой мир ру поиск людей Щёлково
    база данных домашних телефонов: скачать базу данных мобильных телефонов Магнитогорск
    Белгород база данных пользователей вконтакте – база данных жителей
    телефонный справочник utel: Кемерово скачать телефонный справочник 2009
    по сотовому поиск человека – поиск человека по номеру мгтс
    программа поиска людей по фамилии в Южно-Сахалинске поиск домашних телефонов
    телефонный справочник по фамилии: телефонный справочник найти по номеру

  3. Jason Smith

    February 6, 2010 at 1:51 pm

    We seriously are stuffed when short-term views of the uneducated, gun-toting rednecks dominate those of the passive, long-term, co-existing with nature views of the growing educated majority (we do need wood, but clear-felling is horesh*t).
    It will be interesting to see how the federal pollies respond to the corrupt Tasmanian government’s sanctioning of the destruction of their own state. Before eco-tourism, we need eco-warrior tourism to highlight the greed of a few (RIP Ben).
    I’ve seen the destruction first-hand when I took a detour from a main road in Tassie. It was appalling.
    Dr Kev, your views noted….theoretical democracy sounds great. All for it. How many are informed to influence decision making? It’s not perfect….which is why you need people to push extremes so an acceptable middle road emerges. Ghandi was onto something with his methods. If we all acted through democratic/socially ordered channels, nothing innovative/life changing/history changing would occur.
    One quick look at history will reveal millions who have died at the hands of their democratically elected leaders, how is this any different? Human behaviour and environmental interaction cannot be summarised by our best governing process, ie democracy. Machiavelli was onto something.
    Just a thought, how many trees do we have left and how long will it take us to deforest them all? I’ve been alive nearly 40yrs and we’ve not added more than we’ve deforested in my time. When will that reverse? What will cause it to reverse? Surely that simple math must be redressed. This is the complexity we need to delve into to determine the “how” we coexist rather than suck down a winnie red and swing an axe and say “yeah mate we all need wood”. No shit sherlock. Look at the now well respected indigenous populations around the world (including our aboriginies), nearly all coexisted with their environments in a sustainable way. How about we start there or maybe we should all become religious, Christ was a chippie, he might have some answers.
    I dream of driving a huge dozer with a chain on it through Paul Lennon’s Gunn designed lodge and say, she’ll be right, it’ll grow back. That would make the mastercard ad…priceless.

  4. Samantha Darnell

    April 18, 2008 at 2:07 am

    An angel guarded the ancient forest – what an inspirational account of beauty and strength of spirit challenging the madness of greed and destruction.

  5. Dr Kevin Bonham

    March 11, 2008 at 2:01 pm

    No Pilko, you have it totally wrong as usual and are just making a typical blustering, ranting personal attack. You are the last person on earth to be lecturing anyone about depth as your contributions here seldom if ever rise above talkback-radio level whinging. As for Victoria Beckham, should you really be insulting the substance of a PETA supporter in this manner? I suspect you are right to do so but I would be interested to know the basis for your view that Posh Spice is especially insubstantial. I’m not personally as interested in vapid celebrities as you, so I may have missed something.

    As a “supposedly top notch psephologist”, I can advise you of the existence of a political party called The Greens, of which you may be unaware.
    If the general public strongly agreed with the actions of the anti-forestry protestors, they would more often vote for said party.

    It is true that some proportion would be turned off doing so by the Greens’ position on social issues or economics or by some view that voting for minor parties is futile or destabilising, but on the other side of the ledger would be those who vote Green for their social-issue or economic views rather than their views on the legality of forestry protests. There would also be some who vote Green for their views on forestry issues without necessarily agreeing with all illegal actions taken by some to further those views. In any case, the number of voters turned off voting Green would not be sufficient to stop the party gaining many more seats than they do now.

    There remains a major-party consensus on forestry because major-party flirting with anti-forestry politics contributes to electoral failure as demonstrated by both Cheek and Latham.

    Gerry’s claim in #23 that the politics of forestry is not on the table at election time is simply nonsense.

    As for “public opinion” I would be interested to know which demonstration of it Gerry has in mind. Would that be the Wilderness Society poll of 2001 (which in fact showed majority support for the idea of not reserving all tall old growth forests), the Doctors for Forests poll which misled the respondents with a bogus preamble, the TT poll which apparently wasn’t a proper poll at all (although no-one seems to actually have the details) … Gerry needs to be specific here.

  6. Pilko

    March 11, 2008 at 1:39 am

    Kevin if you would just remove that bitter pill that has moved from your throat up into your left eye you would be able to see the bleeding obvious. That is, that its actually the lack of choice in our 2 party dominated “modern democracy”, and the political sameness in the 2 their homogenous “elected representatives” that indirectly decides whether that “modern democracy” allows or disallows certain forms of protest such as disrupting harvesting (cough, cough) operations.
    For a supposedly top notch psepholoigist your analysis of matters pertaining to our democracy have about as much depth as posh spice

  7. don davey

    March 11, 2008 at 12:35 am

    (20)
    bonham assumes that people still believe in souls, well ! the fact is that many do ! i’m not one of them ! however i respect their right to do so, and in my opinion the “Angel” demo although mostly symbolic ! captured the hearts ,minds, and imagination of all who veiwed it, including the judge who threw it out of court.
    That can,t be denied.
    d.d.

  8. Dr Kevin Bonham

    March 10, 2008 at 10:38 pm

    Re #16, people are (sometimes) being arrested (and typically slapped on the wrist in court) not for what they try to stop but for how they try to stop it. This has been debated here countless times before – there are plenty of legal avenues of protest, which the “modern democracy” extensively provides for.

    Curiously enough it is actually the voters in a “modern democracy”, who, through their choice of representatives, indirectly decide whether the “modern democracy” allows or disallows certain forms of protest such as disrupting harvesting operations. This may come as news to some opponents of logging, who may be of the view that what a “modern democracy” should or should not find acceptable depends solely on their own political preferences.

    “Modern psychology” might be a more interesting topic to discuss; it is news to me that the field still has any room for such religious fairytale babble as “souls”. 🙂

  9. Eleonora Gullone

    March 6, 2008 at 4:12 pm

    It is hard to believe that this is happening in a so called “democratic” country in the 21st Century. People’s rights and choices are being ignored. People are being gagged and arrested for trying to stop the slaughter of the wildlife in their beloved land and the rape of their precious wilderness. This is all being done under the watchful eyes, and indeed, with the support of the legal authorities which in any modern democracy should be stopping such appalling acts from being conducted by people who have been elected to protect and represent those who elected them. Instead, the boys in power are looking after their own and are being driven by greed and short term gains totally having lost sight of the damage they are causing and the theft they are creating of this amazing land from their children. In the end, they will be pay with their souls!

    Eleonora Gullone, PhD, FAPS
    Associate Professor of Psychology
    Monash University
    Australia

  10. Eleonora Gullone

    March 6, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    It is hard to believe that this is happening in a so called “democratic” country in the 21st Century. People’s rights and choices are being ignored. People are being gagged and arrested for trying to stop the slaughter of the wildlife in their beloved land and the rape of their precious wilderness. This is all being done under the watchful eyes, and indeed, with the support of the legal authorities which in any modern democracy should be stopping such appalling acts from being conducted by people who have been elected to protect and represent those who elected them. Instead, the boys in power are looking after their own and are being driven by greed and short term gains totally having lost sight of the damage they are causing and the theft they are creating of this amazing land from their children. In the end, they will be pay with their souls!

  11. Dr Kevin Bonham

    March 1, 2008 at 11:58 pm

    Post 8 is more or less off-topic (the Leser article having only made passing reference to the issue of animal poisoning) but I have submitted a response to the current 1080 discussion thread, the one that is entitled “the killing hypocrites of native creatures”.

  12. Mike Adams

    March 1, 2008 at 11:30 pm

    We’ve E-mailed it to family and friends in the U.K. and France and Canada. ‘The whole world’s watching.’

  13. don davey

    March 1, 2008 at 6:41 pm

    On Feb 29, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Nancy Biskovich wrote:

    Thanks for informing me, Sean…..

    I’ll share it with friends and read it all this weekend.
    It seems the GREEDY and the powerful and robbing
    us all while most are struggling. But it is the only
    work worth doing right now. Protecting what is
    still here.

    Thanks, Sean….
    I’ll see who will do something about it.
    Fond Regards,

    Nancy

    Nancy Biskovich
    Senior Photo Editor
    The Trust for Public Land
    116 New Montgomery St., 4th Floor
    San Francisco, CA 94105
    415-495-4014 ext. 322
    http://www.tpl.org
    The Trust for Public Land – Celebrating 35 years of conserving land for people–2 million acres and counting.
    “sean@seandavey.com”

    d.d.

  14. don davey

    March 1, 2008 at 6:38 pm

    To: Nancy Biskovich Nancy.Biskovich@tpl.org>
    Subject: Re: Help save our forest,s

    Thanks Nancy. I know that those folks down there in Tasmania would very, very, very much appreciate some help. I think sometimes when you’re fighting these kind of battles, you wonder weather the world knows of your plight. It’s encouraging then in these kind of situations to hear from the other side of the world. Certainly I encourage yourself or anyone who you think might be able to help, to make contact with some of these people in Tasmania, fighting the battle.

    Aloha Sean
    d.d.

  15. don davey

    March 1, 2008 at 6:35 pm

    Hey Dad
    I received an encouraging reply from the people at The Trust For Public Land, located in San Francisco. I’ve been helping them fight developers, right here near out condo. They wanna put up another 5 hotels in an area that only has one.

    Sean
    d.d.

  16. Brad

    March 1, 2008 at 11:12 am

    Would any of you have any sympathy for this person if she was dressed differently?

    I put it to you all that the only reason most of you are so fired up about this is because she is an “ANGEL”.

    If she was your true down to earth regular person protestor you would haven’t even noticed her………………….she was just playing media on their sensitivities.
    If she was dreadlocked and smelly from being up there for 2 days no one would have blinked an eyelid.

  17. Mike Adams

    February 29, 2008 at 8:31 pm

    #7 follow-up.
    A mistake, I suspect, by his P.R. minders is Saturday’s Mercury, wherein Mr Gay complains of constant pressure and criticism.
    There’ll be a barrage (if the Merc is game to print it) of opposing views and stories, such as the dead 1080 pets, the overspray, the PAL Act, MIS plantations, the shonky environmental assessments, the Gunnsmoke and so forth.
    Kind of the Merc to set the ‘Sell Gunns shares’ piece next to Mr Gay’s lament.
    And Mr Lennon, trying to boost HIS image finds himself upstaged by Mr Gay’s greater number of column inches.
    And not one word in the Examiner about the Audit Office’s report on Tasmania’s Forestry subsidies, which made the Oz and the Merc.

  18. don davey

    February 29, 2008 at 3:21 pm

    I sent the Angel piece to my son “Sean” whois asurf photographer in Hawaii and here was his answer.
    =====================

    Fuck !!! We are talking about Australia here. Not fucking America. Since when did Australia get so damned litigated. This absolutely sucks. I know some people in key places here in the U.S.
    in organisations that help to protect the land and fight big companies like this. I’m going to forward this to a bunch of them and see if I can get some help from over here, even if it’s just getting the message out.

    Good on ya Dad…

    sean

    P.S> Such a beautiful, simple but effective protest (the Angle)

  19. don davey

    February 29, 2008 at 3:15 pm

    (8)
    David ! i also made up a piece incorporating the Angel article and the loss of “MUFTI” and sent it to over 20 newspapers and several of our esteemed Pollies !

    I,m a great believer in the pen being mightier than the sword.
    d.d.

  20. David Obendorf

    February 28, 2008 at 8:42 pm

    I am sending David Leser’s excellent Vanity Fair article on this blank fairytale about Tasmania to my friends via email.

    Please do the same.

    This shameful ecocide that continues in Tasmania is unsustainable and the stench of corruption is as strong as the rotting corpses of the thousands of Tasmanian native animals killed by 1080 poison. The devils feed off the carcasses, sometimes they even cannabalise each other…and they get more aggressive and bite hard and often.

    And then spontaneously an infectious cancer explodes on the scene. This is the reality of Tasmania today AND it is also a valid metaphor for the ignorant greed that could be seen as the psycho-pathology of our powerful ‘devils in paradise’.

  21. Mike Adams

    February 28, 2008 at 12:49 pm

    We notice that John Gay doesn’t answer questions. ‘Gunns not available for comment’ is a constant refrain to media stories. John Gay makes statements only. The only time he answers questions is at Gunns A.G.M. and then apparently he gets flustered. So maybe his P.R. minders have told him to answer nothing and appear incontrovertible and all powerful. There’s no Question Time for Gunns…

  22. Lynette Shennan

    February 27, 2008 at 6:42 pm

    I lived at Maydena and had the privilege of being taken into the magnificent styx valley and saw the tallest tree in the southern hemisphere by one of the Youd brothers;who worked in a two man operation felling trees for Australian Newsprint Mill this was in the 1970’s. This man and his workmates respected the forest around them and only selected what tree they wanted from a coup and left the rest alone.

    There was no clear felling destruction as is happening today. When did greed and monopoly take over this beautiful island?

    Please Political representatives think!

    When we destroy the very things that sustain us we diminish ourselves as human beings.signed: “Angel supporter”

  23. Renata Daniel

    February 27, 2008 at 1:12 pm

    I was liucky enough to visit Tasmania a few years ago and also spent time travelling around and enjoying the forests and all the wild creatures that seemed to cross the roads, especially at night, around every corner. I felt that I was in a very special place. Just like everything else, we WILL be lamenting the loss of these forests when they are gone..
    HANDS OFF THE FORESTS OF TASMANIA!!!

  24. john Hayward

    February 26, 2008 at 10:36 pm

    I remain baffled as to why the Wilderness Society refuses to even acknowledge the huge areas of private land forest being flattened yearly, This area surpasses in volume the 15,000 ha of public forest extirpated annually in Tasmania. It is within the power of any state government to halt or control private land clearing, as has been the case everywhere except Paul’s Tasmania.

    In the complete absence of any plausible arguments for the most intensive native forest logging in the developed world, why shouldn’t we attribute it to the most intensive corruption in the same sector, and demand Federal intervention?

    John Hayward

  25. Simon Parsons

    February 26, 2008 at 7:56 pm

    Excellent summary. It is all so sad. Lindsay – can you mail out this article to all Tasmanians?

  26. Dave Groves

    February 26, 2008 at 2:16 pm

    Well that pretty much sums it all up.
    Keep up the fine work.
    Dave Groves

Leave a Reply

To Top