Tasmanian Times

Environment

Don’t pulp our future

Peg Putt Press Release

Consumption and Welfare Costs of $1.18 billion. Foreign Debt Increase of $4.2 billion

(The Mercury report: Pulp pollutants alarm)

THE Tasmanian and Australian Greens today held the public launch of their joint submission to the RPDC on Gunns proposed Bell Bay pulp mill, entitled ‘ Don’t Pulp Our Future’, which comprehensively critiques the project and concludes that in the interests of sustainable development, intergenerational equity and the precautionary principle the RPDC must reject the current proposal.

Greens Opposition Leader Peg Putt MHA introduced Professor Andrew Wadsley, a principal of expert consultants Australian Risk Audit, who prepared a Risk Audit Report and an Economic Risk Assessment for the Greens (both contained in Vol 2).

Australian Risk Audit identified 71 major risks in 12 different sectors, the majority of which have been either ignored or wrongly quantified; concluded that the mill would increase the foreign debt by $4.2 billion with only an $800 million reduction in exports; and forecast a consumption and welfare loss of $1.18 billion, saying the project has a less than 35% chance of producing a consumption and welfare improvement to Tasmania.

Ms Putt also foreshadowed that a third volume would be launched in the near future when the expert consultants who contributed to an Air Quality assessment were available.

“In our comprehensive submission we have addressed health impacts and air pollution associated with Gunns pulp mill; the impacts on the marine environment; the emission of toxic chemicals; use of outdated technology; adverse effects on fresh water, forests and biodiversity; economic and social concerns; problematic assessment methodology; and opportunity cost to Tasmania,” Ms Putt said.

“We believe that the health impacts from increased air pollution arising from the pulp mill are of the gravest concern to residents in the Tamar valley and particularly the more densely populated areas of Launceston and Georgetown, and that Gunns assertions of negligible health impacts are just plain wrong and irresponsible.”

“Gunns determination to use chlorine compounds in the bleaching process makes this way below top notch worlds best, and means that production and emission of extremely toxic pollutants is inevitable.”

“The refusal to assess the impacts on our native forests and the magnificent forest dependant species like the wedge-tailed eagle and the giant freshwater crayfish is condemned as an abrogation of accepted principles of environmental impact assessment.”

“The findings of our expert consultants on economics and risk assessment are very concerning, and paint a quite different picture to the rosy spin in the Gunns impact statement which has simply failed to assess the downside of their pulp mill, “ Ms Putt concluded.

Read for yourself on the Tasmanian Greens’ website:

www.tas.greens.org.au/issues/focus_on/index.php?CampaignID=182

Christine Milne:

Gunns’ pulp mill statement ignores climate change impacts

Gunns’ forecast impacts of its proposed pulp mill are fundamentally flawed because they fail to take account of climate change and the long-term impacts on the environment over the 30 year life of the project, Australian Greens climate change spokesperson, Tasmanian Senator Christine Milne, said today.

“Gunns’ analysis of the marine impacts of the proposed pulp mill is based on wrong assumptions,” Senator Milne said in Hobart.

“The integrated impact statement (IIS) fails to take account of the cumulative impact of the pulp mill’s pollution stream into Bass Strait in a changing climate. It ignores the scientific evidence that Bass Strait does not flush and that the pollution will concentrate and not be diluted or dispersed, as Gunns’ claim.

“Climate change is forecast to make the north east of Tasmania dryer yet Gunns want to take 26 billion litres of water a year out of the ecosystem and pump it into Bass Strait as toxic effluent.”

Senator Milne said Gunns’ forecast revenue from selling power from the plant based on burning native forests could not be verified because Gunns had not disclosed the assumptions on which it was based.

“Already, the $25 price of renewable energy certificates cited by Gunns has dropped to $20. Given the reluctance of energy wholesalers to buy ‘dead koala’ energy, Tasmanians need to know whether the government has required Aurora to enter into a long-term contract to purchase power from burning forests, to the financial detriment of Hydro Tasmania,” Senator Milne said.

“In addition, the pulp mill energy plant would pump 40 million tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, on top of the increased soil carbon emissions as a result of clearing forests, further adding to the burden of greenhouse gas emissions when Australia needs to reduce emissions.

“Tasmania’s clean, green and clever industry direction emerged after the collapse of the Wesley Vale pulp mill project and now underpins the state economy. Gunns’ pulp mill undermines this reputation and is the wrong sort of project for Tasmania because the long-term negative impacts on the state, its people and environment will far outweigh any short-term financial gain for Gunns.”

Senator Milne contributed to the Greens’ submission to the Resource Planning and Development Commission which the Greens released today at a news conference in Hobart.

Author Credits: [show_post_categories parent="no" parentcategory="writers" show = "category" hyperlink="yes"]
5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. David Mohr

    October 1, 2006 at 12:00 pm

    Bob Gordon was trying to assert on radio this morning that the State and Federal Government deal with Pacific National will provide funds for new rail infrastructure for the Pulp Mill. That’s interesting I thought the $118 million was to upgrade existing infrastructure. Reactivation of old lines like the one to Herrick in the North East would cost tens of millions more. Bob is clearly trying to put people’s minds at rest about the transport of logs to the mill. It won’t work Bob, we are not that stupid!

  2. Joe Blow

    September 30, 2006 at 5:15 pm

    “All you zombies show your faces, I know you’re out there
    All you people in the street, let’s see you
    All you sittin’ in high places
    It’s all gonna fall on you
    It’s all gonna fall on you!

    Holy Father, what’s the matter
    Where have all your children gone
    Sitting in the dark
    Living all by themselves
    You don’t have to hide any more”

  3. Frank Nicklason

    September 30, 2006 at 12:31 pm

    Neil Stump,chief executive of the Tasmanian Fishing Industry Council, is right to expect a well scoped and rigorous approach to the risk assessment for his industry in relation to chemical outfall from the proposed Gunn’s pulpmill. (The Mercury 26/9).

    In April this year the dangers of inadequate policing and regulation of chemical runoff leading to a decimation of the fishing industry of Sydney harbour and it’s estuary because of high Dioxin levels in a variety of locally caught fish was widely reported.

    Public Health Authorities warned against eating anything more than occasional seafood snacks from these waters.

    Dioxins have been linked to brain dysfunction in children and,in particular, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). There are other serious health concerns regarding these chemicals.

    Consumption of (uncontaminated) fish is part of a healthy diet and people expect that adoption of the ‘precautionary principle’ in the pulpmill planning and development will safeguard this important food source.

    (Dr) Frank Nicklason
    West Hobart

  4. Joe Blow

    September 29, 2006 at 7:37 pm

    “”If it was a totally-chlorine free, closed-loop mill that used plantation timber, the probability would be that it would be economically world’s best practice and would match Tasmania’s brand,” he said.”

    As long as Tasmania’s brand remained as tarnished as it is now. I agree with Brenda. The dirty plantations have to go.

  5. Brenda Rosser

    September 29, 2006 at 7:25 pm

    “..Gunns’ pulp mill undermines this reputation and is the wrong sort of project for Tasmania because the long-term negative impacts on the state, its people and environment will far outweigh any short-term financial gain for Gunns.” ”

    We could go further and say that dumping of artificially cheap agricultural and agroforestry products on World markets backed by subsidies of billions of dollars has to stop. Now.

    Subsidies, I might add, that are funded by the taxpayer.

    Our fight for survival here in Tasmania must incorporate an attack on the policies of the World Trade Organisation.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Receive Our Weekly Tas Roundup

Copyright © Tasmanian Times. Site by Pixel Key

To Top