MARGARETTA POS:
Enticingly, the frontispiece, with the heading, Inner Collins Apartments, has a panoramic photograph strapped across the page, with ‘Sheer Inner City Luxury’ printed underneath. And the photo? It is of the Hobart Town Hall. This may be a good investment lure, but it is surely questionable when the Hobart City Council has yet to consider the development application.
The buildings of this block are of a relatively uniform height and character. The proposed development is utterly incongruous with this and would irreversibly detract from the Murray/Macquarie Street crossroads — the only crossroads I know of in the nation with sandstone building on each corner.
Not only will the aesthetics of this historically important area be detrimentally affected, but the historic fabric itself will be directly affected. The proposed development will abut such important buildings as the Queen Mary Club and Hadleys Hotel, while nineteenth century stables will be reused as a gymnasium and lap pool.
THE wheels are in motion for the $40 million hotel and apartment complex planned for the centre of Hobart. While the proposal for another unleavened lump squatting in our city may not yet have been approved by the Hobart City Council, the developer appears to be confident it will go ahead.
The first most Hobart residents knew about it was when the plan appeared on the front page of The Mercury on Tuesday (October 11). They also discovered that objections closed the same day.
Potential investors, however, had advance notice.
Investment in Inner Collins, as developer Doherty Hotels calls it, is being handled by Edwards Windsor. And Edwards Windsor has posted a glossy, 16 page brochure to valued clients, inviting investment.
There are 42 stylish apartments, with river or mountain views, all with balconies of varying sizes, with a price range of $375,000 to $930,000, no doubt well designed. There are also three luxurious penthouses on the eleventh floor, two with water views, for $1,775,000 and $1,800,000. The third, with mountain views, has a price tag of $1,825,000.
Investors are told that should the development fail to go ahead, they will get their money back. They are also being told that the prices listed will be accepted “unless higher offers are received.”
Enticingly, the frontispiece, with the heading, Inner Collins Apartments, has a wide angle photograph strapped across the page, with ‘Sheer Inner City Luxury’ printed underneath. And the photo? It is of the Hobart Town Hall. This may be a good investment lure, but it is surely questionable when the Hobart City Council has yet to consider the development application.
The well orchestrated push for this development to go ahead was revealed at a meeting hosted by West Hobart Neighbourhood Watch at the Lawrenny Court Meeting Hall last night (Ocober 12). Candidates in the Hobart City Council election were invited to air their views and those who turned up did so to about 25 ‘Watchers’.
It was one of these ‘Watchers’ who revealed that she had received the investment brochure, as others have since told me. She did so because of my speech at the West Hobart meeting, which follows.
“Concern about the future of Hobart spurred me into standing for the Hobart City Council.
It was triggered by two events.
One, when the Council lost control of the Hobart waterfront, when the State Government established the Sullivans Cove Waterfront Authority. I wasn’t surprised the Council lost control and I am not opposed to a Waterfront Authority. But I am angry that the Council doesn’t have a voice on it.
Two, the Council’s approval of Zero Davey at the entrance to the city — a building hated by nearly everyone. A second Marine Board building if you like.
And now we are faced with another monstrosity.
There it was, on the front page of The Mercury yesterday, a $40 million, 11-storey hotel and apartment complex — another unleavened lump in our city — with objections closing yesterday.
I object. More than that, I stand in protest.
The Lord Mayor has said tonight that the Council is about to embark upon a 20 year vision for Hobart.
I ask you to look at this proposed development.
It directly affects the aesthetic nature of the area.
The buildings of this block are of a relatively uniform height and character. The proposed development is utterly incongruous with this and would irreversibly detract from the Murray/Macquarie Street crossroads — the only crossroads I know of in the nation with sandstone building on each corner.
Not only will the aesthetics of this historically important area be detrimentally affected, but the historic fabric itself will be directly affected. The proposed development will abut such important buildings as the Queen Mary Club and Hadleys Hotel, while nineteenth century stables will be reused as a gymnasium and lap pool.
This is outrageous. It must be stopped. Surely, all developments should enhance our city, not detract from it.
Alas, the Council is not a town planner — it has become a processor of development applications.
I am not a member of any political party. I am a swinging voter, I look at the issues — and the candidates — at every election, then decide how to vote. I urge you to do the same.
Finally, I have spoken about public access to the Battery Point foreshore at earlier forums. I want to say that my preferred option was always a walking track. But such has been the covert opposition to any further access than now exists, I would support a low impact boardwalk around the headland. If you have a computer, I ask you to log on and read www.oldtt.pixelkey.biz where my views on this contentious issue have been recorded and I hope that anyone who was at the Battery point forum last week, will ask others who were there to look at this website.”
After candidates had their say, there was a half hour for questions from the floor — which ended in a slanging match. Who between? Lord Mayoral aspirant Marti Zucco and Deputy Lord Mayor Eva Ruzicka, who is seeking another term. No-one could hear what the fight was about and the chairman rose and closed the meeting.
Not, however, before Lord Mayoral aspirant Jeff Briscoe lobbed a personal missile into the debate over public access to the Battery Point foreshore.
He accused the late Alf White of trying to chase his Dad off the Battery Point foreshore eighty years ago. “He said he owned it,” Briscoe said. Sir Alfred, of course, was the father of John White, senior vice president of the Battery Point Sullivans Cove Community Association which is in the eye of the storm on this issue. Surprisingly, Association president and aldermanic candidate David Edwards, did not get to his feet in protest.
Mr Briscoe ended by asking those present to consider voting for three candidates for aldermen, including me, which he has also done on this website. I rose and thanked him for his support, but said (and I say it again), that I am not aligned to any party, faction or person.
Margaretta Pos is a candidate in the Hobart City Council election. Written and authorised by Margaretta Pos, 13 Crelin St, Battery Point, 7004.
Alderman Marti Zucco
October 13, 2005 at 09:52
Sensationalism sells newspapers! This is a well known fact! Never mind the truth or the facts! Just leave out this certain important parts of the “sentence†and the whole meaning will change. This is a ploy used often by some reporters who do not seek to report about ALL the facts! This is often the case by some in our political arena and happens often. One of my pet hates. The reason I became involved in Local Government in the first place.
Like me or hate me I say it how it is and not afraid to speak out. This is a trait of mine over the many years in Local Government. My record stands for it self “not afraid to speak out and tell it as it is! I prefer it that way as I have never had egg in my face over the past 13 years telling stories!
My speech covered this very issue. About storytellers and how a story will change constantly. Some facts left out and new parts added ultimately changing the original story and the factual events relating to that story!
It is obvious that Margaretta must have had her reporter’s ears on last night and did the normal thing that some reporters do! Selective reporting to sensationalize the true events!
As we all know Margaretta Pos is a Mercury reporter who in her time has written many a story to help sell this newspaper! It seems to me that this form of reporter’s sensationalism has made its way to this forum!
It is quite disappointing to read the article written by Margaretta Pos in particular what she has written.
I will point out to the readers of this forum that in politics the truth and facts eventually come out. Not telling the true story will see it eventually put egg an on one’s face! Storytellers always become unstuck.
We all remember “the children overboard†story that eventually put an egg on the face of our political heavyweights?
Media watch is my favorite TV program and the lengths that some media personal go to is amazing. A shame media watch wasn’t at the meeting!
My advice to Ms Pos is simple! The reality of politics is a lot different to the fiction of sensationalism written by reporters. The facts will always find their way to the forefront!
Shame on you Margaretta! But I suppose what do we expect from a reporter who now seems to be sensationalizing to the public with the intent to be elected into politics? Will be interesting to see what your fellow reporters will write about you should you be elected into politics.
Alderman Marti Zucco
October 13, 2005 at 10:23
PS; Margaretta Pos has stated that she is NOT aliened (sic) to any political party, faction or “person�
She quoted “(and I say it again), that I am not aligned to any party, faction or person
Ms Pos has been endorsed by Dee Alty. A long time labor party member, who works for and is the partner of federal labor MP Dick Adams.
The question in my mind is?
Is that aligned to any political party?
Is that aligned to any political faction?
Is that aligned to any political “person�
Will Dee Alty being a political “person†and a long term labor party member and who we know endorsed Ms Pos have any political influence or advice for Ms Pos? Is that aliened (sic) in any way?
Well my mind is thinking about it!
Alderman Eva Ruzicka
October 13, 2005 at 12:52
As Margaretta has been noticeably absent from planning committee meetings at Hobart in the last 3 years, she may not have noticed the consistent attempts by a majority of Aldermen to prevent meaningful public interaction and consultation with the planning scheme and development applications.
So next time she goes up the counter at the Council and asks for a copy of a development application to take away and analyse at her leisure, and finds she is only allowed to read it in the Hobart Council Centre and not take copies away, only make handwritten notes, and has to go cap in hand to the the Director for his permission to have a copy at his discretion, she may well spare a thought for Alderman Ruzicka’s foiled attempts to change the system and how a majority of Aldermen at Hobart are not interested in making planning easier for ratepayers.
Likewise, in the future when she tries to fathom the A4 Development application notices posted on a property as it flaps away in the wind, or the small print in the public notices, spare another thought for the same Alderman who has been trying, again with no real support from other Aldermen, to make the signs larger, more visible, with more information, and, luxury of luxeries, a drawing of what is proposed.
That’s what the final few words were about at the West Hobart meeting were about – not a slanging match, but an attempt to stand up to the bullying of those who just don’t appear by their voting record at council to give a damn. And from the comments made personally to me by a large majority of local residents attending afterwards, they knew very well what I was talking about and just whose rights I’ve been trying to defend. Hope you make it onto council Margaretta; another vote of support would be welcome.
Authorised by Eva Ruzicka 699 Huon Road Fern Tree
Margaretta Pos
October 14, 2005 at 02:52
No need to think anymore about it Marti.
I’m not aligned to any party, faction or person.
That’s why people with such diverse views have chosen to publicly support me – Dee Alty, Jeff Briscoe, Amanda Lohrey, and Jane Rankin-Reid. And it now seems, Eva Ruzicka.
Marti, I thank them all. As I did you when you told me you were glad I was running
Alderman Marti Zucco
October 14, 2005 at 04:59
Reading what Margaretta Pos and Alderman Eva Ruzika have had to say is like doing the twist and playing chess at the same time!
The twist!
The twist of who a person is aligned to? Yes we all have support from different people but being endorsed by a well known labor identity has a different twist than receiving general support! Being endorsed by Dee Alty has that left labor twist to it.
To chess!
I must say it is check mate! Why you may ask? Well I did point out that stories do change and story tellers are just that!
Day one we had Margaretta Pos quoting “which ended in a slanging match. Who between? Lord Mayoral aspirant Marti Zucco and Deputy Lord Mayor Eva Ruzickaâ€
I pointed out that “About storytellers and how a story will change constantlyâ€
Today we have Alderman Ruzika stating “the final few words were about at the West Hobart meeting were about – not a slanging matchâ€
So Margaretta stated that it was a slanging match and Eva pointed out that it was not a slanging match!
So dear candidates who is telling the story or are both of you wrong!
A twist of checkmate! I rest my case!
No wonder I love to watch “media watch†now we can have “candidate watchâ€
Hmm I am sure that you pointed out to Jeff Briscoe that you would prefer that he not continue to say that he supports you? I may stand corrected but I think Jeff knows that!
Yes Margaretta I did pointed out that I was glad to see that you were running, you left out a few words but hey that’s normal, I also pointed out that I believed you had a real good chance to be elected. Anyway that was a personal conversation but if sharing it with this forum helps you get elected I suppose that’s good!
But you need to get your stories right as the one you wrote about is already all over the place!
The stories also as told by Eva fascinate me to the point that I am jealous that I haven’t the same imagination as Eva!
Good Luck Margaretta and lets hope if elected and reality sets in you will remember my kind words of wisdom about getting the facts right!
Alderman Marti Zucco
October 14, 2005 at 07:23
Reading what Margaretta Pos and Alderman Eva Ruzika have had to say is like doing the twist and playing chess at the same time!
The twist!
The twist of who a person is aligned to? Yes we all have support from different people but being endorsed by a well known labor identity has a different twist than receiving general support! Being endorsed by Dee Alty has that left labor twist to it.
To chess!
I must say it is check mate! Why you may ask? Well I did point out that stories do change and story tellers are just that!
Day one we had Margaretta Pos quoting “which ended in a slanging match. Who between? Lord Mayoral aspirant Marti Zucco and Deputy Lord Mayor Eva Ruzickaâ€
I pointed out that “About storytellers and how a story will change constantlyâ€
Today we have Alderman Ruzicka stating “the final few words were about at the West Hobart meeting were about – not a slanging matchâ€
So Margaretta stated that it was a slanging match and Eva pointed out that it was not a slanging match!
So dear candidates who is telling the story or are both of you wrong!
A twist of checkmate! I rest my case!
No wonder I love to watch “media watch†now we can have “candidate watchâ€
Hmm I am sure that you pointed out to Jeff Briscoe that you would prefer that he not continue to say that he supports you? I may stand corrected but I think Jeff knows that!
Yes Margaretta I did point out that I was glad to see that you were running, you left out a few words but hey that’s normal, I also pointed out that I believed you had a real good chance to be elected. Anyway that was a personal conversation but if sharing it with this forum helps you get elected I suppose that’s good!
But you need to get your stories right as the one you wrote about is already all over the place!
The stories also as told by Eva fascinate me to the point that I am jealous that I haven’t the same imagination as Eva!
Good Luck Margaretta and lets hope if elected and reality sets in you will remember my kind words of wisdom about getting the facts right!
Debox
October 15, 2005 at 08:49
FANTASTIC
I’ve just read all that stuff; like falling over into a gatheriing of laundry baskets at the laundromat. Zucco, your undies are filthy man. Filthy of course is modern slang for all things bright and colourful. And of course, the fragrant perfumeries elsewhere in the tangle promote feisty dynamic cultures alive as yoghurt.
You’re a lovely bunch of coconuts. I’m proud to be local with you all in the crew. And local’s the word here, and culture too. Roads, rates and rubbish are finally cracking at the seams, to make room for local cultures; which we note have a tendency to be sat on by states, federations and a fist full of sixes. One might expect that it was a bunch of local dwellers who formed a local council which joined with other locales and finally stitched up the island, with the local dwellers properly on top. On top where they can cult unique so that unique place can grow strong enough to shrug aside the goldern arches of corporate capitalism and the thieving water lords, and shrug aside excessive compromise in built culture by sheer negative hand clap rather than the pot luck of legal tangle.
Thanks especially for the TasmanianTimes Laundromat. I wonder who’ll be in tomorrow. Probably the same crew, all with freshly soiled clothes and dressed cultural updates; and others too.
Go the distance all of you.
a random moi
phill Parsons
October 16, 2005 at 15:53
left, left, left; right right right, dee halti.
Comrade Adamski why can’t we here your opposition to Uranium Mining.
Oh now you march in sterp with capital. Is that good for you.
right right right, a most interesting circular motion.
Dr Kevin Bonham
October 17, 2005 at 15:10
phill, please save your myopic wibble for a thread that it is actually directly relevant to, or start a new one.
I’d post a more lengthy comment but far too many of my posts have wound up in Tumbolia lately so it’s just not worth the effort at the moment.
Debox
October 21, 2005 at 05:16
GO THE DISTANCE
Go the distance to your most ideal actualisation. And make sure it’s not bound by mammonian power.
I’d say the present encumbant is good for more mayorial, providing a ground for fair and go ahead sprouts, like the reflexes powered by the wisdoms of brain and journalism and the stalwart tin-tacking of the pictorial development application poster. And dare I say it even the flamable passions and sheer arrogance of the green russian bulldog. Certainly not the shallow vision of a mountain scar deemed desire.
In going your distance you may find the need to step from the path … more youropic than mine.
a random moi