There are two mortal diseases affecting the whole of humanity. They are called Apathy and Corruption!
Apathy coupled with ignorance has allowed dictators to dictate. It feeds on the instilled belief that people have not got the power or ability to do anything about the situation they find themselves in, and ‘change’ is in the hands of others.
It is an acceptance of their fate. Only when repression becomes intolerable, is the next potential dictator allowed to rise through the ranks, generally with popular support, to cast out the old one.
In their past, most dictators were ‘People’s Heroes’, but once in power, the reforming zeal and promises fairly quickly deteriorate into the second disease — Corruption.
The populace settles back down again into hopeless apathy.
It’s the pattern all over the world. They rise on misery, gain power by promises which they have no intention of keeping, and then generally ensconce themselves and quickly distance themselves from the public by armies of armed protectors, either military or police. The next act is to root out their original opponents, but that quickly expands to anyone who is a perceived threat. Basically, a different saddle on the same donkey.
In the more democratic countries, the actions may not be so severe, but the intentions are the same. It is ‘Stay in Power at all costs’! Here their success depends on alternative methods and by remaining politically agile, and for this they employ hosts of Spin Doctors whose job it is to discredit and harass any opposition.
They generally try to grab the media, as this is a powerful weapon to spread their propaganda, discredit the opposition and cement their power base. They are all aware that the people have short memories.
Sugary coating
They also attempt to convince the populace at large that all the actions they take are for their ultimate benefit. Corruption is given a sugary coating and all is well in the world. Providing they are not directly affected themselves, the public will generally go along with this. The NIMBY approach. (Not In My Back Yard).
I think it is something to do with the innate herd instinct whereby people like to congregate together and look for a leader to tell them what to do. They will put up with quite a degree of discomfort and philosophize about their fate, but providing it fits in with this instinct, they will accept it.
They all look for a strong man to lead them, and a strong man is not necessarily a nice man. None of them like to disturb the status quo.
So the running of the world is left in the hands of the unscrupulous, the corrupt, the ruthless and the power hungry, who use just those assets to rise to power.
The sheep continue to get slaughtered, but that’s alright as long as it is not them.
Agitators, provided they are not too potent, are useful to them, for it allows them to get their spin doctors into action to counter their claims, discredit them and promote their own propaganda and image. ‘There is no such thing as bad publicity!’
In Tasmania, it is already being forecast that Labor will retain government at the next election.
Despite the allegations of cronyism and unaccountability, and despite the slaughter of our forests and the collapse of the health system, they will still get re-elected.
Admittedly, they are walking a fine line, but the opposition is seen as no better, and that is a benefit to the incumbent party.
The Greens are generally vilified at every opportunity, and they have not got the financial support to launch an effective counter strategy.
Even the forced interference at Federal level to conserve some of our forests is now being claimed as a major victory in saving our heritage and preserving workers’ jobs by the Labor Party!
A true Mafia style victory in protecting our forests from themselves. They are currently spending a $2.2 million Federal grant to publicise this.
Barnaby Drake: “Born in London, but educated in India, before returning and graduating in Fine Arts from London and Birmingham. Many productive years in the midlands as a mainframe computer analyst, during which period he invented that great stress reliever – bubble wrap. He subsequently emigrated to South Africa, where he returned to the Arts, making a living as a journalist, photographer and writer. He has also written papers on such diverse subjects as Ancient British archaeology, astrophysics, the human brain, pottery, philosophy and philately, as well as couple of ordinary books. He has since retired to Tasmania, while retaining all his interests, due to his recent marriage, he is now growing roses and fat.”
nudger
June 10, 2005 at 09:28
“Despite the daily allegations of cronyism, corruption and unaccountability, and despite the slaughter of our forests and the collapse of the health system, they will still get re-elected.”
It’s a real bastard that democracy, eh Barnaby!
Brenda Rosser
June 11, 2005 at 06:43
Elections are not in themselves a sufficient condition for the existence of democracy.
One has to be informed of precisely what one is voting for. It appears from a 20 year perusal of the Tasmanian media that word isn’t getting out there.
Ignorance coupled with apathy.
Barnaby Drake
June 12, 2005 at 16:45
The Gunns 20 case
On 8 April 2005, a Directions Hearing took place before Judge Bongiorno of the Supreme Court of Victoria.
His Honour made a number of orders following lengthy argument. The orders relate to the provision of documents referred to in the statement of claim, the provision of further and better particulars and the postponement of the need for the Defendants to lodge their defences.
Subsequent to the hearing, the Court has designated 4,5 & 6 July 2005 for a further hearing. This hearing may see application by all or some of the defendants to strike out the statement of claim.
“Strike out” refers to the court dismissing the entire or part of the statement of claim. There are several bases upon which to strike out, including that that statement of claim, or paragraphs therein, does not contain a cause of action (a legal basis for the claim) or is vexatious, or is otherwise an abuse of process.’
If it subsequently turns out that these claims are, as they say, vexatious or an abuse of privilege, then surely the Defendants have a right to claim both expenses and damages from the Plaintiff.
These damages could be for stress, inconvenience and the mental torment brought on by the effect of this claim in that it has caused them considerable distress and mental anguish, in that had it been successful, it would have ruined their lives and family and =jeopardised their entire future.
They have been forced to live with this threat hanging over their heads for several months and have further been vilified by the press and the government and been
subjected to public opinion and prejudgments in this case.
If each of the twenty accused could then claim one million dollars compensation, plus expenses, this would decidedly be a quid pro quo, in that the damages would almost exactly equal the amount of the original claim against them, and certainly make any corporation think twice before engaging in a similar SLAPP action.
Barnaby Drake.
Not Barnaby Drake
June 12, 2005 at 16:47
Removing discrimination.
There is a strong concern that the majority of the electorate in Tasmania are actually urban dwellers and do not have the advantage of seeing the forestry processes at first hand.
To counteract this discriminatory process, it is therefore proposed that a demonstration should be arranged for their benefit.
All the trees bordering Salamanca Place and round the Parliamentary lawns should be harvested. Like all forestry practices, this fact should not easily be made available to the inhabitants beforehand, as the ‘surprise factor’ is actually part of this demonstration.
Overnight, all trees should be felled and removed, just leaving stumps and branches, carefully scraped into a huge heap in the middle of the said lawn. This is also convenient, as it will then prevent it being used later by uninsured demonstrators.
As compensation for all the valuable woodchips that have been removed, a can of diesel-gel, a bag of blue carrots and a small box of e.nitens seedlings can be left on the Parliament steps.
I am sure they will all understand and appreciate the benefits to the State and the significance of this type of demonstration.
This is not written by Barnaby Drake
Cedrict
June 13, 2005 at 02:55
What a superb and concise analysis of the Labor State government. It rings true, very loudly, also as a critique of the Federal Liberals.
I often wonder if this is now the world that we come to expect given that so many people in power or close to it are so totally out of touch with the reality of life in struggle street.
Through all the spin and hype it is heartening I feel to see such as Petro Giorgio and his small group having the courage to take on our Bonsai (little Bush) (“Sugary coating They also attempt to convince the populace at large that all the actions they take are for their ultimate benefitâ€), in a head to head over our draconian and inhuman immigration detention laws.
Shall there ever be a new Knight in shining to save Tassie from itself. Simply put, in the supposed democratic system we often get the political overlords that best reflect what we are ..…..or do we?
Prince of Darkness
June 14, 2005 at 10:04
So people are apathetic because they do not share Green values? Maybe people are motivated by other values, and are apathetic only towards the Greens.
So people vote for Labor and the Liberals because they have big budgets? But at the federal level Labor loses despite all that money.
What about looking at what Greens are pushing through the media? Maybe the Greens are not seen as a viable alternative because of what they support. Maybe people’s priorities are not hugging trees or protecting little worms. Maybe they are worried about paying a mortgage, educating their kids, finishing a degree.
As for me, I hope the Greens hire Barnaby Drake as a political analyst; it will ensure that they are never elected into government.
Nudger
June 15, 2005 at 09:09
Go Prince of Darkness!
The Greens had their moment in the Accord and dropped the ball in the goalsquare. They were revealed to be very naked emperors and empresses indeed. Geez, aren’t we mixing up the metaphors here.
Anyway, they will now be forever consigned to the sidelines where they can complain endlessly about never being picked again but with nobody really listening … or caring. Barnaby Drake is obviously just some young chap who has come into the game late and suddenly realised he won’t ever get a real kick, expect in the tender region between his knees and his belly button.
Gotta play for another team Barnaby. Better nominate for the national draft. The Libs have done so poorly the past few seasons, they’d be looking for a few priority picks. Trade in the hair shirt for a pin-stripe suit and you’re away.
Having said all that about the Greensters, you do have to admire Guru Bob for boofing it up the Chinese and Cowardie Howardie over the defecators.
How Bob would have loved to have stood in front of that tank in Tianneman Square. It would have been the same frisson as standing in front of one of Electric Eric’s bulldozers along the Gordon.
But alas, those days are gone. Protest are more symbolic than significant and so the new generation, the young Barnaby’s, have to deal with such tawdry realities as the democratic processes. And that other bloke who reckoned it was all the media’s fault. Don’t be a nong. Just because the Mock doesn’t want to print it, doesn’t mean people don’t know what’s going on in their home town. Get real please. Haven’t you heard of a pub, or a messageboard, or a Democrats’ quiz night. Now these are the places with the truth is truly spoken.
But young Barnaby, don’t give up. As Billy Joel said when he had a full head of hair and hadn’t married half a dozen times: “there’s a place in the world for the angry young man!”
Just don’t expect everyone else to share your views … or get the irrits when they don’t!
Mick Field
June 16, 2005 at 05:47
A definition of democracy hereunder. I decided to look it up, too!
And the point you were making Barnaby?
Main Entry:de·moc·ra·cy
Pronunciation:di-‘mä-kr&-sE
Function:noun
Inflected Form(s):plural -cies
Etymology:Middle French democratie, from Late Latin democratia, from Greek dEmokratia, from dEmos + -kratia -cracy
1 a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority b : a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
2 : a political unit that has a democratic government
3 capitalized : the principles and policies of the Democratic party in the U.S.
4 : the common people especially when constituting the source of political authority
5 : the absence of hereditary or arbitrary class distinctions or privileges
nudger
June 17, 2005 at 05:17
Barnaby,
So much vitriol, so much angst, so much pain.
Can we heartily recommend a Bex and a good lie down?
If you were to read back over this site you will see this writer is no mouthpiece for Gunns, having seriously lampooned many who are.
How sad that you and your ilk all to readily resort to that label for anyone who doesn’t agree with them.
These are the very reasons that many people don’t vote Green. Absolutism does not a happy democracy make.
Absolutism, whatever the colour, produces dictators. A ha, I see the first bristling of the little black moustache already.
You have already whacked the general population severely around the head for daring not to fall into line by voting in your mates. They are, according to you ignorant, apathetic, whatever. How dreadfully patronising – and dangerous.
What next? If they’re not going to use the vote wisely, what the heck, let’s take it away from them. Our very own Tasmanian Crystal Night.
There’s a stack wrong in the Tasmanian forests. We all know that. Tasmania’s imperfections are debated with an exciting ferocity. Argument, some logical, much not, is alive and well. All sides of the issue are out there.
People then must be left to make up their own minds. You reveal a weakness in the solidity of your cause if you think it will be beaten by agitprop, glossy brochures and John and Paul walking arm in arm through the forest. Have more faith in your fellow humans, and respect and accept their judgements and assessments.
If you can’t do that, if you must descend into the perjorative and vituperation as a response to their responses, you have lost your argument and weakened your cause already.
As I said at the outset, ain’t democracy a bastard.
And by the way, you won’t shut me up by trying to align me with Gunns, the Government, or anyone whether from the Left, the Right, the middle.
Nice tactic but we home grown Tasmanians are a wee bit tougher than that, particularly in response to the insults of blow-ins and Barnaby Come Latelies.
To use a great line from the days of yore: If you don’t like it here, piss off back to where you came from.
We’ll produce our own saviours thank you very much. Heard of a bloke called Flanagan? He says it so much better than you and we raised him on the West Coast, not in some pompous part of the old Empire which would still try to tell us how to live our lives if it could.
God spare us all from whingeing Poms!
Prince of Darkness
June 17, 2005 at 10:10
Barnaby,
I recommend you to read this list of fallacious arguments, so you can keep going: http://www.don-lindsay-archive.org/skeptic/arguments.html
So far, against my comments you have used:
Ad Nauseam
Ad Hominem
Selective observation, etc
My original point was that there is a lack of self-criticism in your post: people are apathetic and corrupt because they do not share your ideas. I say, that is bullshit; people are apathetic because you do not provide a credible alternative. Full stop.
You should be grateful that Geoff, nudger and myself are participating in this discussion. If it wasn’t for our letters TT would be a series of posts with zero to two comments.