Much publicity has been given to the logging of a portionof the northern peninsula of Recherche Bay. When my father bought the property in about 1948 he was interested in a portion of it that contained very straight trees suitable for jetty piling, which was in vogue at the time.
Alos, the James Craig was on the shore of the land which had an old title to the low-water mark and he had a dream of refloating that ship to use as a barge for carrying the piles to Hobart.
My brother Robert subsequently paid my fathr for a half share. Before the plan could be executed ill-health forced my father to abandon the idea. When he died in 1967 all his estate was willed to my mother, who, after my brother’s death in 1987, transferred the land to my nephews, who are now at the centre of the controversy.
I must say that my father would be horrified if the bulk of this land was to be cleared of the beautiful trees that have grown there.
Selective logging for milling timber we might have agreed with as it had been milled previously. But I feel certain my father would not have been party to clear-felling.
As the existing plan proposes a 14sqm section to be left to create a mosaic effect, this is tantamount to clear-felling.
My father never spoke of the historical importance of the peninsula nor was he cognisant of the garden and artefacts it contained. As further archeological work seems essential, I can but propose that logging at any stage be abandoned and my nephews be adequately compensated for the loss that such a measure would entail.
That the State Government should have permitted a road to be constructed through a wildlife sanctuary to reach the land beggars belief.
Greville R.E. Vernon
Riverside
Letter published in The Mercury, Friday, April 29.
Dave Groves
May 3, 2005 at 01:12
Recherche Bay is a beautiful place by all accounts.
I have never had the luxury of visiting, only my eyes have been treated via the media exposure given to this idyllic place. Recherche Bay has historical significance no doubt. The owners are caught in controversy.
Damned if they do and damned if they don’t.
It is a great shame that all “stakeholders†can’t come to an arrangement that would be amicable for one and all.
The owners want to develop their land for income; others want the site preserved for its historical and cultural significance. I just like it because it looks like a beautiful place.
With the current state of Tasmanian forestry and their “expert†process for removing timber from “coupesâ€, it is small wonder that people are worried about the consequences for Recherche Bay.
The state government is quick to shell out money for big business that is in trouble, so why not shell out some money for these people. The owners will have what they want i.e. income and others will have history preserved.
The state i.e. the people of Tasmania will have something to treasure for all time.
(See Recherche Bay: Click on Recherche Bay in Links, Tasmanian Times Masthead.
Jason Lovell
May 6, 2005 at 05:29
Well, surprise, surprise, surprise. Seems the artfully constructed story that’s been VERY carefully woven around the need to log Recherche Bay is just that – art, pure art.
The Vernons have repeatedly stated that their family purchased this land for logging, but this appears to be somewhat of an exagerration; “I must say my father [who originally purchased the property] would be horrified if the bulk of this land was to be cleared” [Greville Vernon]
Strangely, after watching the Vernon Brothers utilising the media repeatedly in the last few months, I’ve heard nothing from them about this issue, ie, why DID the family purchase the land at Recherche Bay.
The exposure of firm and clear public statements as exagerrations is always somewhat mortifying – I’m guessing they’re a bit embarrassed by their uncle’s revelation.