What do you do when something happens that you know to be wrong, unethical or inappropriate?

A person behaves unethically; actions are taken that you know are inappropriate or fraudulent; a decision is made that is not based on the facts; an adverse outcome could have been avoided or perhaps was the result of negligence.

For the individual to act in these situations is often a difficult decision to make, particularly when the other person or persons are more senior than you and in a position of power and authority.

As a society, we are often unsupportive of people who speak out and expose situations that they consider wrong, unethical or inappropriate – those who decide to ‘blow the whistle’.

Yet most so-called ‘whistleblowers’ are ordinary people, just like you, who find themselves in a situation where they have to make a decision – to speak out or to remain silent.

“The world is a dangerous place not because of the evil that some do, but because others do nothing.”
18th century British Parliamentarian – Edmund Burke

Every situation is different and requires careful assessment before action is taken. Individuals wanting to disclose instances of significant maladministration, mismanagement, fraudulence, criminal behaviour or risks to public safety need to feel that in doing so their disclosure will be properly investigated and that, as a result of their disclosure they will not be personally targeted.

Despite Tasmania having Public Interest Disclosure laws protecting persons who come forward to have serious claims of unlawful, unethical or inappropriate activities investigated, we still have workplaces in the public service where job insecurity and the fear of personal harassment and intimidation prevents all but the very courageous from taking that action.

If ordinary public servants could trust the nature and extent of the whistleblower protection that is available and the means whereby they could make a formal communication to an independent body about such claims, maybe our society would significantly reduce the constant stream of serious failures in public administration that governments are forced to react to.

There is a hidden dictum that’s still pervasive in Australia; it suggests to ‘dob in on your mates’ is un-Australian. Ask yourself whether the individuals who you believe have been a party to unlawful, unethical or inappropriate activities are ‘your mates’.

Serious abuses of mental health patients

The revelation of serious abuses of mental health patients in several government-operated facilities in Tasmania is the most recent instance.

Even with the passage of Public Interest Disclosure laws in this state we saw that the individuals who spoke up still were hounded out of their jobs.

Even the politicians who acted as the public advocates for the whistleblower claims by raising them in Parliament where subjected to abusive taunts. Only last week we saw the Opposition Spokesperson for Health break down publicly when the true extent of patient abuses where finally tabled by the Health Minister.

What was happening here?

By hurting others, we only hurt ourselves – Our Common Unity is diminishing.

What is the psychological message that ordinary public servants receive when they see their Minister and Government belittle and ridicule other elected politicians who raise public interest concerns in our Parliament?

Maybe it tells the ordinary person in Government workplaces, that Governments do not treat such concerns seriously and even our elected politicians will use ridicule, abuse and bullying in an attempt to silence such revelations.

Little wonder ordinary people have little trust in these Public Interest Disclosure laws.

What hope have ordinary people got!

We must move away from this pernicious culture of put-down and bullying – it is simply unhealthy, hurtful and destructive to the very fabric that is our Common Unity – our Community.

David Obendorf is a veterinarian.