Tasmanian Times

Politics

Mr Lennon and self service

It’s a rare day when I agree with Senator Eric Abetz, but his assessment of Paul Lennon’s motives in the debate surrounding compensation for victims of abuse in state care is spot-on: “[the Tasmanian Government] rushed out to the media with a fanfare saying these abuse victims were going to be compensated … because Paul Lennon wanted headlines.” [Eric Abetz, 9/3/05]

While Senator Abetz made the Federal Government’s position clear on a number
of occasions over this issue, the Tasmanian Government ignored him and repeatedly stated that it had legal advice to the contrary.

It seems the legal advice in question was a little bit wrong, as it inferred that the Tasmanian Government’s compensation payouts would not be seen as such when it came time to repay Medicare, something ALL other recipients of compensation payments are required to do.

Leading advocate for the victims, Steve Fisher, seemed to be across the legalities of this issue at the time, raising questions about the Tasmanian Government’s motives in steadfastly sticking to its legal guns for so long. I personally find it worrying that the Tasmanian Government’s legal advice on this issue came from the same person who advised them over Richard Butler’s payout, but that’s another matter.

Seeking a cheap headline

Anyway, Senator Abetz also made the strong point that the Federal Government would be obliged to pay victim’s medical expenses on behalf of companies such as James Hardie if they set a precendent by paying Tasmanian abuse victim’s medical expenses on behalf of the Tasmanian Government. Obviously this is a precedent to be avoided at all costs.

Paul Lennon is now desperately trying to focus attention on the prospective $10 billion budget surplus in Canberra, over and above his own complicity in using victims of child sex abuse in state care as pawns in his latest “nice guy” makeover attempt.

The good Senator called it “seeking a cheap headline,” and I cannot disagree. I hope the media, the people and especially the victims also see Paul Lennon’s behaviour for what it really is: shallow self service.

Author Credits: [show_post_categories parent="no" parentcategory="writers" show = "category" hyperlink="yes"]
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. joel harvey

    April 1, 2005 at 10:02 am

    My name is Joel Harvey I am 26, I was abused in foster care in 92, I have since returned Tasmania in 2002 to complain to the ombudsman about the lack of infrastructure in government departments.

    This action and the action of Wally Tussen, Steve Fisher (S.I.C.S.A) and others have lead to the ombudsman’s inquirry.

    There where 700 confirmed cases before the ombudsman before Easter. The latest information I have received is the there are a significant amount more then 700. This leads me to estimate around 1000 cases. I will have more accurate information in the coming days.

    This has been downplayed by the Government to the media and the public.

    The DHHS review team are UN aware the ombudsman has such a high number of cases to investigate.

    So where is the $60,000,000 coming from????

    If it is too big for the state government then where is the justification for the federal government not to investigate?

    This downplaying has to stop.

    Joel Harvey

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Receive our newsletter

Copyright © Tasmanian Times. Site by Pixel Key

To Top