Tasmanian Times

pressreleases

Liberals Cynically Delay Two Controversial Bills Hoping MLC Mix Will Change

Facing a storm of stakeholder and community condemnation and defeat in the Legislative Council, the Hodgman Liberals have cynically delayed debate on two divisive, contentious pieces of legislation until after the 3 May Legislative Council election.

There isn’t much that’s transparent about the Liberals, but we can see straight through this attempt to see if a shift in the balance in the Upper House will tip the vote on high conservation value logging and weakening the anti-discrimination Act in their favour.

Outside the Liberal Cabinet, there is almost zero support for these Bills and a high degree of understanding about the damage they could cause if passed.

On the plan to open up 356 000 hectares of high conservation value forests, now the sawmillers the Liberals claimed to have on side have expressed their opposition.

They join every key forest industry player in the State in calling on the Liberals not to reignite conflict over forests which were set aside to go into reserves under the Tasmanian Forest Agreement.

Proposed changes to the Anti-Discrimination Act 1998 would make it easier for a person to use religious belief as a defence for spouting racism, sexism, homophobia, ignorance and hate.

The decision to delay debate on the Anti-Discrimination Amendment Bill 2016 was made on the same day the Premier and the Parliament apologised to lesbian, gay, transgender, bisexual and intersex Tasmanians and their families for the harm caused by past unjust laws.

It’s pretty clear that debate on both these cynical and unjustifiable pieces of legislation has been put off by the Liberals until after the Legislative Council elections, not because it’s the right thing to do, but because they are hoping the numbers will eventually fall their way.
Cassy O’Connor MP | Greens Leader

Author Credits: [show_post_categories parent="no" parentcategory="writers" show = "category" hyperlink="yes"]
1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. TV Resident

    April 16, 2017 at 8:47 pm

    I have always been under the impression that the ‘upper house’ or MLCs should be Independent as they are the ‘house of review’. What is the point of voting in ‘party political’ contenders??? I will be voting for 100% Independent and not the fraudulent ‘Independent labor’ or ‘Independent liberal’. In my opinion you can’t be both Independent and be aligned with a party as well. As soon as party politics take over the Upper house, it is pointless having them there as they have to vote with their party even if their party is in power or opposition and this then becomes a ‘dictatorship’. I believe the latter is what the liberals are hoping for.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Receive Our Weekly Tas Roundup

Copyright © Tasmanian Times. Site by Pixel Key

To Top