Tasmanian Times

Economy

Pokies: Misleading and untrue

Former president of the Australian Hotels Association and past Chairman of Host Plus, the Hospitality Industry National Superannuation fund Greg James is alarmed that the State hospitality industry’s peak body should be drawn into supporting the current Labor government’s election campaign defence of poker machines.

Recent comments by Steven Old that the reduction of poker machines would lead to job losses are “pure ALP sponsored scare mongering and nonsense”, James says.

“Tasmanian hospitality is at serious risk of being completely consumed by the AHA’s slavish dependence on Federal Hotels’ monopoly”, says the former owner of Knopwoods Retreat and the Oyster Cove Inn.

“Poker machines not only strip capital out of main street Tasmania, they also erode a range of skilled hospitality industry positions”. The Productivity Commission could not pin-point any net benefit to Tasmania after the introduction of gaming.

“When a venue’s main income derives from gambling, the need for trained personable hospitality employees decreases, causing job losses. The employment does not involve nearly as many people to empty a poker machine as to make meals and serve in bars. Customers don’t eat or drink nearly as much when they spend the evening in front of a poker machine. Many problem gamblers have next to nothing left over to buy evening meals or drinks in the hotels hosting poker machines.”

“The fact that Mr Old is trying to defend gaming while ignoring the crisis in hotels without gaming is indicative of the slavish dependence on gaming that the AHA has developed over the past 15 years. Community gaming hotels have become extensions of the casinos and exploiters of the vulnerable; non gaming hotels are on their last legs and employing minimally and have become non-competitive, thus their traditional servicing of local communities has virtually disappeared”

Mr Old misquotes Senator Xenophon, who did state that the only advantage Tasmania had was that we did not allow ATM machines near Pokies. But we are equal in all other matters and needed to reduce our betting limits immediately.

Mr James also said that “the Labor government has also been duplicitous in not pursuing policies that allowed entrepreneurs to advance their small businesses and increased employment when they allow so much disposable income to be vacuumed up by the gaming machines”.

“We have no backpacker industry like the Australian mainland or New Zealand.

“Development of fine food and Tasmanian produce into Hotels has stopped.

“Main Street Tasmania is suffering because the gaming revenue does not reach the local newsagency, builder or dry cleaners. Families are broken apart when a parent is punished for gaming related crime.

“If Mr Old prefers this loss of employment and family cohesion then the hotel industry in this state is on a road to perdition,” Mr James said.

Earlier on Tasmanian Times, James Boyce: Why the pokies (and Andrew Wilkie) matter: HERE

Author Credits: [show_post_categories parent="no" parentcategory="writers" show = "category" hyperlink="yes"]
6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Gerry Mander

    March 8, 2010 at 8:37 pm

    Mr Old misquotes Senator Xenophon, who did state that the only advantage Tasmania had was that we did not allow ATM machines near Pokies.

    This is blatantly untrue in the case of casinos, where there is a whole range of them available to the public and very close to the pokie machines!

  2. Concerned Resident

    March 8, 2010 at 7:31 pm

    If the gaming public weren’t feeding the greed of the gaming industries and the gov’t…This same money may be spent in local shops and venues that will eventually return it to local society. The gullible who have lost their homes, families and some have even lost their freedom because of these hideous, addictive heaps of junk. The sooner they can be gotten rid of, the better.

  3. Steve

    March 8, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    Very true Ben (2). In the states without pokies, the pubs started to have a problem. RBT and anti-smoking laws were a big incentive to drink at home.
    In response they had to develop, or go bust. One of the things I look forward to when I go back to WA is an afternoon down the pub with friends. Boutique beers, live music, good atmosphere, plenty of laughter, no aggro.
    Try and find it in a “pokie pub”!

  4. Roger

    March 8, 2010 at 12:48 pm

    Poker Machines.

    Mere redistribution of wealth from the poor to the rich.

    What’s wrong with that??

  5. Ben Peelman

    March 8, 2010 at 11:13 am

    Since when were “public houses” gambling houses and dens of sin? Free poker is being played in pubs every night of the week (getting around the law because it’s free), while more and more adolescents are getting hooked on free internet gambling. While this is nothing but an advertising push by the gambling industry, every gambler I know tries to borrow money off me. And I have less money than any of them!
    If Australia was meant to have legal gambling, why don’t we just give up and allow legal two-up on every day of the year?
    Clearly the Australian Hotels Association is beholden to the gambling industry, but perhaps Hotelliers could kick the gambler out of bed and get a rockstar to sleep with them instead: How many hotels do you know have both pokies and live music? And when you think of a pub or club with a lively atmosphere, is it the one with live music, or the one with that faint jingling sound grating multiple nerves?

  6. salamander

    March 8, 2010 at 10:49 am

    Forestry and gambling, two peas in a pod, both run to serve their masters not the community, both given preference over other businesses, both causing serious harm to Tasmania, and both fiercely supported by and supportive of labor – and of course the ditto liberals. Time for a change!

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Receive our newsletter

Copyright © Tasmanian Times. Site by Pixel Key

To Top