image

The CEO of AFMA in his response to Andrew Wilkie states that “the fishery is managed in a sustainable and precautionary way, based on the best available science”. This makes me despair of so-called scientific decision making in Australia.

The IMAS-Neira report, on which the total spawning mass is based:

* has not been peer reviewed,

* has not been “clearly supported” by the Director of IMAS in public

* is not based on data collected for jack mackerel

* was not carried out for the purpose for which it is being used

* is based on data 10 years old

* has not been used as part of a Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE)

* contains no uncertainty statistics

* is not consistent with the large declines in historical catches of jack mackerel over the past 7 years

* presents analyses which are demonstrably wrong.

Shame on all you “scientists”, if we can call you that, who support this travesty!

Posted by Dr Andrew Wadsley on 03/08/12 at 08:28 PM

This observation first published on this MR here, Super Trawler quota not worth the paper it is written on … Comment is not available below. Comment on the original article