by Daniel Lopez & Zowie Douglas-Kinghorn, Jacobin magazine
As the 2022 Australian federal election rapidly approaches, a wave of blue-green independent candidates standing in upper-middle-class electorates has Coalition MPs hot under the collar. According to Liberal polling, this ‘teal tsunami’ looks likely to claim the blue-ribbon seats of Kooyong and Goldstein from treasurer Josh Frydenberg and assistant minister Tim Wilson, respectively.
The most recent YouGov poll, published in the Australian, backs up this estimate. Teal independents are mounting serious challenges elsewhere, including in the Australian Capital Territory, Queensland and New South Wales. Unlike other independents, the teal ones derive their hue from Climate 200, a group whose mission is to fund candidates who align with its values on the environment, government integrity, and gender equity.
Politicians and pundits across the spectrum are entranced. Former Liberal prime minister John Howard has derided the teal independents as ‘anti-Liberal groupies‘. Deputy PM Barnaby Joyce has warned of ‘chaos’ if teal independents win. Meanwhile, patrician small-L liberal outlets have celebrated the Climate 200 independents as a grassroots-led reinvigoration of democracy. The skeptical have accused the organisation of being a party in all but name, or of entrenching the power of ‘dark money‘ over politics.
Climate 200 may be a relative novelty in Australian politics, but not so in America. In essence, it’s a political action committee (PAC), an organisation that pools donations to fund campaigns and candidates. Progressive or not, by their nature, PACs are political organisations that maintain and reinforce elite control over politics. Far from repairing democracy, PACs are part of the problem.
Read the full story here: With Climate 200, Political Action Committees Have Arrived to Australia (jacobinmag.com).
