Article
Legitimate Reasons for Owning Firearms – Hunting
To invigorate the Tasmanian Firearms Debate, Tasmanian Times is running a series on the pros and cons of Firearms in the community.
In Tasmania, hunting is a legitimate activity for food security, pest control, conservation, and cultural practice. This is particularly relevant for Tasmanian Aboriginal Peoples, where it forms part of Caring for Country and sustainable land management recognised under law.
Firearms ownership for hunting is lawful, regulated, and purpose-limited in Tasmania. It supports conservation, pest control, food security, and Caring for Country, while operating within strict licensing, training, and public safety frameworks that distinguish legitimate use from misuse.
Ownership of multiple firearms is legitimate because each firearm serves a distinct, lawful hunting and/or land-management purpose.
Different species, terrains, animal-welfare requirements, and Caring for Country practices necessitate appropriate, purpose-specific firearms, all held under strict licensing, storage, and public safety controls.
Legitimate reasons for hunting in Tasmania:
- Caring for Country (Indigenous land stewardship)
For Tasmanian Aboriginal Peoples, hunting is a core part of Caring for Country—a holistic system of land management that predates European settlement by tens of thousands of years. Hunting supports ecological balance, knowledge transfer, and cultural continuity. - Cultural practice and intergenerational knowledge
Hunting is a lawful and protected cultural activity for many Indigenous communities, involving the transmission of ecological knowledge, seasonal indicators, and respect for animals through Elders to younger generations. - Sustainable food security
Hunting provides fresh, nutritious protein where store-bought food is expensive, limited, or poor quality. This is also extremely important for the low social economic cohort of Tasmanians, especially in rural areas. - Wildlife and pest population management
Regulated hunting helps control overabundant and invasive species such as feral pigs, deer, goats, rabbits, and cats, which cause significant damage to native ecosystems and cultural sites. - Protection of biodiversity and habitat
Feral species hunting reduces pressure on native flora and fauna, supports threatened species recovery, and protects water systems, soils, and culturally significant landscapes. - Ethical harvesting under Tasmanian law
Legal hunting in Tasmania (and Australia) is governed by strict animal welfare standards, licensing, seasons, and species protections, ensuring animals are taken humanely and sustainably. - Avoidance of industrial farming impacts
Many hunters choose wild harvest as an alternative to intensive agriculture, aligning with ethical concerns about animal welfare, land degradation, biodiversity loss and emissions. - Economic and environmental contribution
Hunting supports regional economies and contributes to conservation through licence fees, permits, Indigenous ranger programs, and land management partnerships. It also supports local economies through hunter visitation outside their home range through the financial support of local businesses. - Land management outcomes
Hunting often complements land access practices by maintaining active presence on Country, monitoring ecological health, and reducing biomass pressure from feral grazers. Hunters also act as a source of local knowledge associated with feral animal numbers which are relevant to land management. - Legal recognition and rights
Native Title and state/territory laws recognise Indigenous hunting rights for cultural, domestic, and non-commercial purposes, reflecting its legitimacy within Australia’s legal framework.
Hunting as a lawful basis for firearms ownership in Tasmania
- Firearms ownership as a regulated tool, not a right
In Tasmanian (and Australia), firearms are owned for specific, lawful purposes. Hunting is a recognised genuine reason under state and territory firearms legislation, with ownership contingent on licensing, background checks, training, and ongoing compliance. - Hunting requires appropriate, controlled equipment
Humane and effective hunting, particularly for pest management, requires firearms suited to the species and environment. Lawful ownership ensures animals are taken cleanly, safely, and with minimal suffering, consistent with animal welfare standards. - Public safety through regulation, not prohibition
Tasmania’s firearms framework prioritises public safety by tightly controlling access, storage, transport, and use. Licensed hunters operate within these safeguards, making lawful firearms ownership compatible with strong gun control. - Indigenous hunting and cultural practice
For Tasmanian Aboriginal Peoples, firearms may be used alongside traditional methods where lawful, supporting food security, land management, and cultural practice. This use aligns with Caring for Country and is recognised within existing legal frameworks. - Conservation and pest control outcomes
Firearms enable effective control of feral and invasive species (e.g. pigs, deer, goats, cats), reducing ecological damage, protecting native species, and safeguarding culturally significant sites which is an outcome endorsed by environmental authorities. - Training, competency, and accountability
Licensed hunters must demonstrate competency, understand species identification, seasons, and safe handling, and comply with inspection and renewal requirements which embeds accountability into firearms ownership. - Rural and remote practicality
In regional Tasmania, firearms are often the most practical and humane tool for land management, food harvesting, and rapid response to pest impacts, particularly where professional control is unavailable. - Separation from self-defence or recreational misuse
Tasmanian and Australian law deliberately separates hunting and land management from self-defence. Firearms ownership for hunting is purpose-limited, reinforcing legitimacy while preventing misuse. - Support for Indigenous ranger and land management programs
Firearms are used within structured Indigenous ranger programs for feral animal control and ecological monitoring, operating under permits, training, and governance arrangements. - Social licence through compliance
The legitimacy of firearms ownership is maintained by demonstrable public benefit of conservation, food security, cultural continuity and strict adherence to law.
Legitimate reasons for owning multiple firearms in Tasmania (aligned with hunting)
- Different species require different firearms
Tasmanian hunting spans animals with vastly different sizes, behaviours, and welfare requirements small game and vermin (e.g. rabbits, foxes), medium sized pests (e.g. goats), larger animals (e.g. feral pigs, deer). Using species-appropriate firearms is a core animal-welfare principle. A Tasmanian hunter traveling interstate to participate in hunting of other species (e.g. feral Buffalo in NT) would require a different firearm than for Tasmanian species.
- Humane outcomes require calibre suitability
Tasmanian codes of practice emphasise quick, humane kills. Different calibres and platforms are required to avoid over-penetration near stock or communities, ensure sufficient stopping power on large animals and minimise suffering and wounding. Owning multiple firearms allows hunters to comply with these welfare obligations.
- Environmental and terrain variation
Hunting occurs across open plains, dense scrub, and mountainous or forested land. Each environment demands different tools for safe backstops, visibility, and accuracy, making multiple firearms necessary rather than excessive.
- Pest control versus game harvesting
Firearms used for professional or semi-professional pest eradication, cultural or subsistence hunting, seasonal recreational hunting often differ in configuration, calibre, and purpose. Separating these uses improves safety, compliance, and accountability.
- Indigenous land management and Caring for Country
On Indigenous-managed lands multiple species are managed simultaneously, firearms support ranger programs, food security, and ecological restoration. Equipment must match both cultural and land-care purposes. Owning multiple firearms reflects functional land management needs, not recreational accumulation.
- Operational separation improves safety
Using separate firearms for night pest control, daytime hunting, training or mentoring and different properties or regions reduces misuse, inappropriate substitution, and safety risk. This is an outcome regulators actively support.
- Redundancy for remote and regional Australia
In remote areas, equipment failure can halt pest control for weeks and access to repairs or replacements is limited. Owning multiple firearms ensures continuity of land management and humane outcomes. This is relevant for Tasmanian hunters travelling interstate or abroad.
- Compliance with licensing and storage law
Tasmanian (and Australian) law already mitigates risk through secure storage requirements, inspections, licence category controls and genuine-reason assessments.
The number of firearms does not increase risk where compliance and purpose are demonstrated.
- Demonstrated history of lawful, safe use
Long-term licensed hunters often accumulate firearms over decades as and access expands, responsibilities increase and conservation roles grow. This reflects experience and trust, not misuse.
- Public benefit outweighs numerical concern
When firearms are used for pest suppression, biodiversity protection, food security and Cultural practice their legitimacy derives from function and outcome, not raw quantity.
The core element of this argument is that all 30 points above must be taken collectively not as single points or single groups of points. When done so it’s clear that a licensed firearm, which are stored correctly, is a legitimate reason to own a firearm and practise the skill of hunting in Tasmania.
If you’re interested in this article, please join our mailing list. It’s all free … and we won’t share your information with anyone!
Truly independent media is a cornerstone of democracy.
Remember: once they gain power the first action of every despot in modern history is to take control of the media, so please consider supporting us.
Your kids will thank you and so will your Granny, but the aspiring despots won’t…
