A Legislative Blueprint For Genuine Tasmanian Democracy

“The fight for Tasmania is a fight for the very idea that government should be of the people, for the people and by the people, not a service desk for corporate titans.”

In this detailed policy blueprint, regular Tasmanian Times contributor and political commentator Steve Loring argues that we must move beyond the “advisory” model entirely. Drawing on the principles of deliberative democracy, he proposes a Tasmanian Community Empowerment Act—a legislative mechanism to turn citizen engagement from a box-ticking exercise into a cornerstone of state governance.

From Tokenism to Transformation – A Blueprint for Empowered Citizen Advisory Boards in Tasmania

Introduction – The Tasmanian Disconnect

Across Tasmania, a palpable sense of democratic disconnect simmers beneath the surface of our island’s political life. From the contentious debate over salmon farming in Storm Bay to the divisive Hobart stadium proposal, from urgent calls for tenancy reform and public housing to the stalled dreams of a Kunanyi cable car, many Tasmanians feel key decisions are made for them, not with them. Governance can appear as a distant negotiation between industry, government, and vocal interest groups, leaving ordinary citizens as spectators to outcomes that shape their communities, environment, and livelihoods. Traditional mechanisms for public input, notably Citizen Advisory Boards (CABs), often inadvertently reinforce this cynicism. Typically ad-hoc and advisory only, they risk being perceived as tokenistic “rubber stamps,” amplifying the rift between the public and its institutions at a time when complex, place-specific solutions are desperately needed.

This essay argues for a fundamental reimagination of Citizen Advisory Boards from symbolic committees into cornerstone institutions of a revitalised Tasmanian democracy. This transformation can be achieved through state-based model legislation a Tasmanian Community Empowerment Act explicitly grounded in the principles of deliberative democracy. Such an Act would move CABs from the periphery to the heart of governance, endowing them with structured influence, representative legitimacy, and procedural rigor. By institutionalising informed, inclusive, and consequential public deliberation on the very issues that divide us, we can forge a new model of co-governance that rebuilds trust, enhances policy quality, and cultivates an engaged citizenry.

Conceptual Foundations – Beyond Consultation to Deliberation

To understand the potential of this transformation, we must distinguish between mere consultation and genuine deliberation. Traditional public comment periods on issues like salmon expansion or the Macquarie Point stadium often present near-finalised plans, soliciting feedback officials are free to disregard. This process lacks the core elements that confer democratic legitimacy.

Deliberative democracy, by contrast, offers a robust framework for legitimate public judgment. Its principles are:

1. Informed Discussion: Participants engage with balanced briefings, expert testimony, and diverse perspectives—from marine biologists to industry reps, from housing advocates to economists.
2. Inclusion & Equality: The process seeks a microcosm of the community, ensuring voices from Hobart, Launceston, the West Coast, and the Islands are heard under conditions of mutual respect.
3. Reasoned Consensus-Seeking: The goal is not simply to tally pre-existing preferences but to forge shared recommendations through dialogue, weighing trade-offs and evidence.
4. Publicity & Transparency: The reasoning behind outcomes is made clear to all Tasmanians.

Models like Citizens’ Assemblies demonstrate that ordinary people, given the right structure, can grapple with profound policy dilemmas. The proposed Tasmanian Community Empowerment Act would embed these deliberative principles into the statutory DNA of Citizen Advisory Boards, making them fit for purpose for our unique challenges.

The Architecture of Empowerment – Key Provisions of the Act

A Tasmanian Community Empowerment Act must be more than a vague endorsement of public participation. It requires precise legislative architecture to confer authority, ensure integrity, and guarantee impact. This architecture rests on three pillars:

1. Structural Mandates for Legitimacy: The Act would mandate the formation of standing or issue-specific CABs for matters of profound public interest. Imagine a Tasmanian Marine Futures CAB, selected via sortition (a civic lottery from the electoral roll, stratified to include coastal communities, industry workers, and urban residents), tasked with deliberating on the long-term social licence and environmental regulation of salmon farming. Or a Housing Security CAB to navigate the complex trade-offs between tenancy reform, landlord concerns, and the urgent need for more public housing. Such boards would be resourced with independent experts, professional facilitation, and a dedicated budget.

2. Process Guarantees for Deliberative Integrity: The law would codify a phased deliberative sequence. For a potential Kunanyi Access CAB, this would mean a learning phase with palawa pakana elders, ecologists, tourism operators, and transport engineers; a consultation phase hearing from residents, walkers, and entrepreneurs; followed by moderated deliberation. Critical to this is the CAB’s right to information, including the authority to request full business cases—such as for the proposed stadium—and summon Treasury officials for cross-examination on opportunity costs and funding models.

3. Integration Mechanisms for Consequential Authority: To move beyond symbolism, the Act must grant CABs measured but real authority. For high-stakes, divisive projects, a CAB’s recommendation could trigger a binding public referendum, ensuring major decisions have a clear, informed social mandate. At minimum, a formal “respond-or-amend” mechanism would be required, where the Premier or relevant Minister must table in Parliament a detailed response adopting the recommendation or providing a compelling justification for divergence. This creates a powerful feedback loop of accountability on issues where political cycles and long-term community interest often clash.

The Transformative Impact – A Tasmanian Application

Institutionalising empowered CABs through this framework would yield profound benefits for Tasmania’s most intractable issues:

Renewed Democratic Legitimacy: Could a stadium funding model approved by a representative, informed cross-section of Tasmanians still face opposition? Likely. But the opposition would be to a decision perceived as fairer and more transparent, de-escalating the “us vs. them” dynamic. On salmon farming, a deliberative CAB could move the debate from entrenched antagonism to a shared search for sustainable balance, integrating economic and ecological data with community values.

Enhanced Policy Quality and Resilience: The housing crisis demands solutions that are both principled and practical. A Housing Security CAB, integrating the lived experience of renters, landlords, and homelessness services with construction cost data, could design tenancy reforms and public housing initiatives that are more nuanced, implementable, and broadly accepted than those drafted behind closed doors. This co-created legitimacy ensures policy endurance beyond election cycles.

Civic Empowerment and Capacity Building: These boards become “democracy schools” for Tasmania. Participants from Queenstown, Devonport, or Sorell develop civic skills and a deeper understanding of the intricate balances of island governance. This experience fosters a network of informed community ambassadors, strengthening the social fabric across our diverse regions.

Addressing Challenges – A Tasmanian Reality Check

Skepticism is warranted. Tasmania’s relatively small population and the “two degrees of separation” phenomenon raise concerns about conflicts of interest and perceived bias in a sortition pool. This can be mitigated through clear protocols, transparency, and by drawing from larger pools for statewide issues. The question of cost is real, but must be weighed against the immense cost of policy failure, legal challenges, and stalled projects that fracture communities. The investment is in social cohesion and durable outcomes.

The primary challenge remains political will. Would any government voluntarily share power on defining issues? This underscores the need for cross-party advocacy and demonstrating to leaders that such a process provides a clear off-ramp from political gridlock, granting them a legitimate, community backed mandate to act on the state’s toughest challenges.

Conclusion – Toward a Complementary Democracy for Tasmania

Our island’s future shaped by how we manage our unique environment, house our people, and spend our limited public funds is too important to be decided by the old politics of division and top-down decree. The journey from tokenistic advisory boards to empowered deliberative bodies is a journey toward a democracy worthy of our challenges.

A Tasmanian Community Empowerment Act provides the roadmap. It envisions Citizen Advisory Boards not as decorative additions, but as vital organs in our democracy organs that pump the lifeblood of public judgment, legitimacy, and local wisdom into our policy process. By creating structured spaces where a representative sample of Tasmanians can genuinely deliberate on the future of Kunanyi, the rules of tenancy, or the balance of our blue economy, we do not weaken representative democracy; we complement and strengthen it. We build a system that doesn’t just ask for our opinion, but respects our collective wisdom. In an age of division, that is the most Tasmanian innovation of all.

Steve Loring is a writer, political analyst and keen observer of the Tasmanian democratic landscape. A recent Legislative Council candidate for the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party (Pembroke), Steve has been a vocal advocate for tenancy reform, housing security and challenging the “neoliberal drift” of Tasmanian politics. He writes frequently on the intersection of corporate power and public interest, arguing for a “bottom-up” renewal of our island’s democracy. 

Tasmanian Times (TT) is a community-based news and current affairs service covering the island state of Tasmania. It exists to provide a diverse presentation of Tasmanian issues. TT creates and supports independent media content utilising the best of modern technologies and tried-and-true practices of public-interest journalism.

Support us in expanding our coverage and developing new content by and for Tasmanians. 

 New initiatives on the way include … what our contributors and readers suggest! Please get in touch with your suggestions.