Article
Will Green Energy Projects Trample Our Rural Communities?
Across Australia, renewable energy projects are being advanced at a pace that leaves communities sidelined. The result is not progress but deep inequity.
In our region, the development of large-scale wind farms has laid bare a brutal imbalance: corporations and governments hold all the power, while ordinary people carry all the costs.
The companies driving these projects arrive with an arsenal of advantages.
Public relations machines that shape the narrative, lawyers who game the system, lobbyists whispering into government ears, and guaranteed access to planning processes.
They are paid, funded, and subsidised to win the argument.
We are not. We stand alone. We are unpaid volunteers in community halls, trying to navigate complex legal and environmental frameworks without resources or expertise.
The playing field is not just uneven; it is designed to crush local voices.
They are paid to persuade while we are forced to plead. They are granted access to processes that are deliberately withheld from us. They impose their vision onto our community, its land, its landscape, its future, while we have no power to impose anything on theirs.
Our concerns are dismissed as nimbyism, yet their interests are dressed up as “nation-building.” They profit while we pay. We wear the mental health burden of division, anxiety and uncertainty. Families are fractured. Neighbours are pitted against each other.
And while corporations bank taxpayer-funded subsidies, the very taxpayers footing the bill, are left financing the destruction of our own wellbeing.
The inequity is not abstract. It is visible in the paddocks, hills and homes of our regions. These projects threaten our landscapes and biodiversity, but the cities that demand them never face the same scars. They undermine the industries that sustain us, agriculture, tourism and food production, while the energy industry thrives.
Our land is devalued, yet we are denied any say on theirs. Our skies are industrialised, while theirs remain untouched. They add risk to bushfires and disaster management, burdening already stretched emergency services, yet accept no responsibility for the danger they create.
And most galling of all, the mental health damage is ignored.
Stress, uncertainty, and the despair of powerlessness eat away at entire towns. Yet corporations continue to parade glossy brochures and PR statements about “wellbeing initiatives” as if this window dressing could hide the truth. They are not funding real support for the communities they are harming. Their moral failure is appalling.
Adding insult to injury, these projects fail the very Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards investors and governments claim as their guiding principles.
Environmental standards collapse when biodiversity is destroyed, bushfire risks rise and millions of tonnes of concrete are poured into fragile rural landscapes.
Social responsibility is trampled when mental health impacts go unmeasured, land values are eroded, and community cohesion is shattered. Pretending that token sponsorships or workplace wellbeing campaigns meet these obligations is a sham.
Governance is a disgrace when consultation is tokenistic, processes are opaque and corporations dictate terms while governments look away.
This is inequity codified in policy, and it should alarm every Australian who believes accountability is more than a corporate slogan.
And what of our leaders?
When I turn on the television to watch parliament, I see the Minister for Energy laughing, mocking and ridiculing the opposition who are defending us. It is as though our concerns and vulnerability are a source of humour for him.
This is more than tone-deaf. It is betrayal from a minister who is meant to represent fairness and equity for all Australians. Instead, what we see is contempt for those carrying the cost of policies he promotes. To sneer at suffering is not leadership. It is dereliction of duty.
We are told consultation has occurred, that our voices have been heard, that these projects will “benefit everyone.”
This is the ultimate insult. Fairness requires equal opportunity, equal access, and equal voice. None of these exist.
Instead, inequity defines the entire process. Those with money dictate the terms, those with access to government set the agenda, and those who profit control the narrative. Communities like ours are left with nothing but the consequences.
This is not about opposing renewable energy. Most of us support the need to transition to cleaner forms of power. What we oppose is the inequitable way it is being forced upon us. Imposed on some, spared for others, profitable for just a few, ruinous for many, celebrated in cities, suffered in the regions.
The rules are being changed quickly to suit the people in power and those who will benefit financially.
Equity demands more than rhetoric. It demands that communities be treated as equal partners, not collateral damage. It demands that mental health impacts be recognised and supported, that land values be acknowledged and compensated, and that biodiversity and bushfire risks be taken seriously. It demands transparency, accountability and respect.
We cannot allow the headlong rush to renewables to trample the very communities it is meant to serve. Our environment, our people and our industries must not be collateral damage in the name of progress.
Those who live closest to these projects should not be the ones who suffer most. Communities deserve a real seat at the table, not token consultation, but equal footing.
Our wellbeing, industries, and environment matter every bit as much as corporate profits and political targets.
If this transition is to succeed, it must be anchored in fairness, respect and equity. Without these, renewable energy will not unite Australians in a shared future. It will divide us in ways that cannot be repaired.
Ben Maguire AM is a farmer in the Yass Valley NSW, community leader, and co-founder of Remount dedicated to supporting veterans, mental health.
Tasmanian Times (TT) is a community-based news and current affairs service covering the island state of Tasmania. It exists to provide a diverse presentation of Tasmanian issues. TT creates and supports independent media content utilising the best of modern technologies and tried-and-true practices of public-interest journalism.
Support us in expanding our coverage and developing new content by and for Tasmanians.
New initiatives on the way include … what our contributors and readers suggest! Please get in touch with your suggestions.
