
Pic of PM Gillard and Nova Peris: 3AW
Wednesday 23 January 2013. Press conference Transcript. Subjects: carbon price, carbon emissions, national security, Nova Peris
CHRISTINE MILNE: Good news today on the carbon emission front - we have seen an 8.6 percent reduction in carbon pollution, we have seen an increase in the amount of renewable energy going into the system. This is exactly what we had hoped for when the Greens negotiated the emissions trading scheme in Australia. We need to make this transition away from coal-fired power to renewables as quickly as possible and what we’ve shown is that far from Tony Abbott’s threats of $100 roasts or Whyalla being wiped off the map, we have brought in a scheme in an orderly way that is significantly reducing Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions. That’s the good news.
The bad news is that at the same time both the Government and the Coalition are supporting an expansion in coal mining.
Greenpeace has brought out a report that shows that the Galilee basin mine in Queensland, if it was its own country would be projected to be the world’s seventh largest polluter. We cannot continue to talk about reducing greenhouse gas emissions and ignore the expansion of coal mines for export. What we need to do is get Prime Minister Gillard and the leader of the Coalition Tony Abbott to commit to reducing coal exports, to not going ahead with this coal expansion, otherwise Australia will be one of the largest drivers of increases in emissions globally and we will be really significantly contributing to a failure to achieve the less than two degrees of warming which all the scientists agree is what we should be aiming for.
So good news, and, Tony Abbott, you have now been shown to be overwhelmingly wrong on carbon pollution and emissions trading. Time now for the Coalition to abandon their opposition, time for them to abandon their threat to do away with the Clean Energy Finance Corporation, and rather get on board with what all Australians want and that is a safe climate for their children and their children’s children, and all the species that depend on maintaining our habitats and ecosystems around the country. And for Julia Gillard, Prime Minister, yes we’re delighted that we’ve not got a Clean Energy Package, we’ve got emissions trading and we’ve got carbon emissions coming down. But Prime Minister, you can’t be serious about climate change and support the expansion of coal mining. Time for that to be out there full and centre, we need a discussion in Australia about how we are going to get away from the expansion of coal mining and coal exports.
JOURNALIST: There’s been some discussion before about big companies getting some sort of subsidies with the mining tax so is that how they can still be exporting such high amounts?
CHRISTINE MILNE: Well Australia has a resource-based economy and the Greens have been saying we need to transition as quickly as possible to a low carbon and then a zero carbon economy. That would bring with it huge advantages because that’s new jobs, new infrastructure. I’ve just come back from Spain where I’ve seen the Gemasolar power plant, Abengoa solar, what we are seeing there is molten salt storage, means concentrated solar power is not something of the future it’s actually happening now -producing energy after the sun goes down. So many opportunities for Australia, innovation, new jobs, new support in rural communities. That’s the conversation we need to be having, but we also need to get rid of fossil fuel subsidies. Because how can you be serious about the climate if you are continuing to subsidise extraction of coal and coal-fired generation. That doesn’t make sense, we need to get off fossil fuel subsidies and move much faster towards 100 percent renewable energy.
One other matter I just wanted to comment on, the Prime Minister has made a speech today on national security. I welcome the fact that she has said we need to be focusing very much on our own region in the global context of security in this decade, but the one thing that she mentioned in passing but not as central to our national security into the future is global warming. All the scientists and the Pentagon as well are saying if you’re serious about global security, you have to address global warming. Because what we’re going to see is displacement of large amounts of people around the world that are going to cause then regional conflicts and we really have to get across global warming. So it’s another reason why the Prime Minister needs to recognise that as long as Australia’s pushing expanded fossil fuels, pushing what would be the seventh largest polluter in the world, the Galilee basin, rather than that what we need to be doing is looking at doing what we can to capacity build around the world so people can stay where they are instead of being displaced by extreme weather events that we know will occur, as has been occurring in Australia over this summer.
JOURNALIST: On national security are you concerned about how that could be balanced against the Greens’ policy of speech online?
CHRISTINE MILNE: My colleague Scott Ludlam will be doing a major press conference this afternoon on the issue of cyber terrorism and on line, but I have to say that in the decade following 9/11 a lot of corners were cut in terms of thinking about proper processes and international law and the reason for that was national security, we must move quickly. Now we need to think carefully about the online environment and the Greens’ perspective is the more open it is, the more public access there is, the more common platforms there are, then the less problems you’ve got from a cyber terrorism environment, but Scott Ludlam will be commenting further on that later in the day.
JOURNALIST: Senator Milne I wonder what your views are with regard to the announcement about Nova Peris being the candidate for the Senate and the Prime Minister’s decision there. Broadly, obviously totally different party, but broadly speaking as someone who’s been in the Senate for a long time now what are your thoughts on what she can bring to the Senate?
CHRISTINE MILNE: I’ve met Nova on a few occasions and I think she is a terrific person, she’s been a great sportsperson, a great I think role model for indigenous communities around the country and for all Australians. I think the real issue here is not what a terrific person Nova is, the real issue is once again the powerbrokers and the back room in the Labor Party has trampled Labor Party processes, normal Labor Party membership input in order to catapult someone into the Parliament. I think what that says is a lot more about the Labor Party than it does about Nova Peris.
JOURNALIST: Do you think they’re trying to capitalise on the fact that she is a well-known figure in sport and things like that?
CHRISTINE MILNE: Look it’s certainly clear that the Labor Party was panicked by the number of Coalition members that were elected after the Northern Territory election and I think part of that would be that Labor is trying to make way in the context of the 2013 federal election. But having said that it is the backroom boys in the Labor Party again driving the strategy against the proper processes of the Labor Party. Now that’s something that Labor has to deal with but it’s one of the reasons why their membership becomes increasingly disillusioned.
JOURNALIST: Could this issue also impact on the Greens in any way?
CHRISTINE MILNE: I don’t think so. We’ll be running very strong candidates around the country and particularly on indigenous issues the Greens are right out in front, we’re the ones who have stood up for indigenous people, for the rights of indigenous people, we’re the ones who got indigenous recognition in the constitution absolutely on the agenda, we’ve stood up against the Northern Territory intervention, and will continue to stand up for indigenous communities and people in those communities know that. Nevertheless I think Nova’s a terrific person, but it’s really not about Nova it’s about the Labor Party.
JOURNALIST: Back on national security, are you comfortable with the relationship the Australian Government is proposing with other nations in the region including military exercises with China, do you think the Government is getting the balance right?
CHRISTINE MILNE: Well I think the Prime Minister when she said that national sovereignty means that we make our own decisions in our own interests, and yet her actions don’t actually deliver on that because what we have seen is the Prime Minister agree to what is effective an American military base in Australia, talking about further collaboration with the Americans out of ports in Western Australia. I think what Australians want is an independent foreign policy. And that is something that the Greens have stood for for a long time. Of course the Americans are our friends and allies but we have to look after our own interests and that means we have to recognise that we are living in the Asian century and we need to engage with China but we need to respect that, not actually get behind the United States in trying to wedge China, that’s my concern.
































Show Comments
Comments (6)
Trish Crossin has been turfed because she is white.
What shall we tell the kids?
A few years ago I was running a festival in an Aboriginal community. Somewhat late in the piece Nova contacted me and asked if she could be involved as she was ‘really keen’. She suggested an ‘activity and motivational talk’ event. I said fine, but as we’ve already allocated the budget we can’t pay you. We have resources that might help: publicity, an on-site coordinator, equipment, lock-up storage, etc. and you’re welcome to access that. She said she was okay with those terms. Next day she was all over our publicist wanting to be put in the press-releases, the published program, the scheduled radio interviews and so on.
A week before the event she sent me an email stating that ‘as her funding had not come through she would be unable to participate’. Apparently she’d asked a private foundation or something for $2,000 to run the event she had suggested, and they had declined. So much for doing it for the underprivileged urban Aboriginal kids at Bagot. So much for being keen.
I also met her on several other occasions dating back to the nineties. Nova in my opinion is a mediocre intellect and self-interested attention seeker. Sounds like she will fit right in to the Labor Party.
Trish Crossin should be an automatic choice as a new Labor senator for Tassie. C’mon, someone draft her now she’s been shafted by Julia and Nova (not even a Labor Party member). She’s been wasted in the NT.
She even looks like a typical Tassie senator. She’s got it all ... intellect, size, and a fine track record as a Labor hack.
Wonder if the fact she was a Rudd supporter had anything to do with her shafting ....
Depends, Comment 2, on what is meant by “a mediocre intellect”.
ALP State and Federal governments have attracted many (often self-styled, and / cheer-squaded) “fine intellects” to “address” indigenous “issues” since the Whitlam era.
And, if you want to see how well all these fine intellects have done, go to The Alice, and, as it says on Sir Christopher Wren’s tomb, “circumspice”.
Do I have to spell it out? We lived in the same apartment building towards the end of my time in Darwin and Nova had trouble remembering what night to put the garbage out. She’ll make Steve Fielding look like Steven Fry.
Pity Pat Anderson got shafted by Crossin in the preselection many years ago, now there was a woman who would make all races proud.
p.s. Tuesday for the hard rubbish (ALP), Wednesday for the recyclables (CLP).
Interesting, first hand knowledge / TT contributor #2/#5 Bohoo.
The PM’s overwhelming support for Nova Perris could bring about some unwanted fall out for Labor given there are already candidates out working at the coalface.
Labor needs to be careful with “Stars”, former rockstar environmentalist Peter Garrett comes to mind with his support for the conditions surrounding the Tamar Valley Pulp Mill!
This great geek is the prancing Federal Education Minister, I am not too sure if he can be trusted as he leaps from one subject to another, maybe that why we dont see him on TV very often these days.
I reckon somebody has tried put a stop to his Star Trek like antics, scaring the kindies, the preps and perhaps the P$F too!
Of cause his electorate will be the ultimate
judge of his worthiness!
I wonder what sort of a stew Nova Perris could create if elected its sounds like showmanship for a start could be on her agenda.
Thank you for the Perriscopic insights, Bohoo!