

Paul Harriss MLC in Sarawak
I have taken this part entry from the Wikipedia site regarding the Taib Family in Sarawak who are looking to get $50 million out of the Australian Taxpayer via a YES vote over the IGA in the Upper House of the Tasmanian Parliament.
This entry uses words that suggest a close match with the Tasmanian logging ethos:
“transfer pricing, corruption, bribery, defamation, libel, scam, blockades, deaths, coercion and kickbacks
This Wikipedia entry, ( here ) is I suggest, good bedtime reading for our MLCs before they vote to give some $50 million to Ta Ann — a company now supported in Tasmania by the likes of Paul Lennon
What say you Paul Harris MLC, a known recipient of Ta Ann’s Largesse; will they get your vote in the Tasmanian Parliament?
This Wikipedia entry on Taib and his family suggests that they might not be the ideal recipients of the Australian taxpayers hard earned cash.
Logging industry
The involvement of Taib and his family in the logging industry is specifically mentioned in a report published by Forests Monitor. According to the report, the chief minister reserves his right to revoke timber licenses while no legal challenge is possible against the chief minister. This is to ensure that the anyone with logging interest is loyal to the chief minister. The report also notes that in general, mutually beneficial relationship between political elites and logging companies often results in corruption, bribery, and transfer pricing, where the financial details of transnational logging companies, including Malaysian ones, are difficult to track.[54] Based on a book written by Michael Lewin Ross, the political insecurity of Taib Mahmud from 1986 to 1991 has enabled him to accelerate the pace of logging in Sarawak. Taib is reported to have used timber concessions for personal and family enrichment.[20]
In 2007, The Japan Times reported that nine Japanese shipping companies, which transported timber from Sarawak, had allegedly failed to report some 1.1 billion yen in income over a period of up to seven years. The report claimed the money was paid to Sarawak officials via a Hong Kong agent linked to Taib’s family.[55] Taib, however, denied totally the Japan Times allegations by presenting a 10-page clarification in the state assembly.[56] He maintained that the payments were legitimate expenses on the directive of the Sarawak government.[57] Taib subsequently filed a defamation suit against Malaysiakini for carrying the news. On 4 January 2012, Malaysiakini issued an apology to Taib after the death of one of its key witness and after the Tokyo Regional Taxation Bureau reversed its decision on the alleged kickbacks.This had led to the withdrawal of libel suit by Taib Mahmud.[58]
In 2008, Indonesian newspaper Tribun Pontianak revealed that around 30 shipments of illegal Indonesian logs was imported into Sarawak and re-exported to other countries every month. Chief minister Taib Mahmud and the company Hardwood Sdn Bhd, a wholly owned unit of state agency Sarawak Timber Industry Development Corporation (STIDC), was implicated in this timber scam.[59][60][61]
In 2009, the Malaysian 2008 annual auditor-general’s report labelled the forest management in Sarawak by state government as unsatisfactory. However, Sarawak’s Second Minister of Planning and Resource Management, Datuk Amar Awang Tengah Ali Hassan questioned the validity of the report as he claimed that the auditor-general’s department did not have the expertise in forest management.[62]
The indigenous community petitions and road blockades against logging in their ancestral lands has led to forceful dismantling of blockades, several deaths and violent coercion by the police and logging industry enforcers.[63][64]
According to Mongabay, Sarawak has lost 90% of its forests cover based on satellite images.[65] However, Taib Mahmud refuted the claim and said that there are still 70% of its forests remain intact and he also plans to invite independent investigations on Sarawak rainforest.[66] As on 3 November 2012, The Economist reinstated that Sarawak has lost more than 90% of its primary forests and has the fastest rate of deforestation in Asia which maybe attributed to the Taib’s control on logging industry.[67]
































Show Comments
Comments (10)
I think Mr Harris now realises that FT let him down with Bob Gordon quoting false regrowth volumes to support a log peeling plant as an alternative to harvest of pulpwood residues from the forest.
As it stands Ta Ann is not benefiting the future health and well being of our State Forests.
Most likely private property owners dont want Ta Ann touching their regrowth forests, who could blame them.
From all accounts Evan Rolley is now the bad guy and Mr Harris realises this, fine, now it is time to get to the bottom of all this masquerading before any reformed TGA outcome is widely acceptable.
The delegation representing the displacement of native peoples that recently spoke here in Tasmania has shown that Hydro Tasmania have inadvertently been caught up in a massive dams scandal in Sarawak.
The Tasmanian government needs to tread very carefully with inviting foreign investment into our state, the Sarawak experience was unfortunate and should not be repeated.
I would like to extend my concerns to the dairy farmers that are proposing a massive buy up of land by the Chinese that includes Circular Head properties, including Rushy Lagoon in the NE and I believe properties within the Fingal-Mathinna area too.
Goodness knows what Premier Lara Gidding told these Asians during her recent visit to Asia, as far as I am concerned we dont want them taking over our land and forcing servility on workers rights in this country.
The solution is, our farmers can produce food for the Asians at our call not theirs.
I must give my personal thanks to Mr and Mrs Wikipedia, for they have told us plenty about how this man and his trusted family members and relatives, what it was and is doing that has elevated the Taib Mahmud family into such prominence.
Both worried and dismayed are the people of Tasmania to see that this State MLC Mr Paul Harriss, (pictured above) is supposedly representing the interests of the State of Tasmania and its citizens?
Something that I just cannot understand is how the people of this State were railroaded into being considered as though we are so supportive toward this so-called trading partner business relationship, (or call it what you will,) which I believe would be better described as a dealing with a nest of fearsome attacking poisonous vipers?
What I do understand is, just how ex-Premier Paul Lennon would have felt quite at home being involved with this clan.
I note that this current State government have two former Lennonist era individuals filling the high chairs of this present State Labor government, in Lara Giddings and Bryan (the giggler) Green, now Premier and Deputy Premier?
Now there is something to truly wonder about, surely this new pair of anti-the-people, pro the Sarawak connection,) now high placed State ministers past, did not come about by some sort of coincidence?
Again I ask the attendees here to remember the time of the TCC scandal that had Bryan Green named as the alleged culprit, then being charged with committing the serious offence of interfering in the due processes of ministerial procedure, which at that time was to benefit an Ex-labor minister mate of Bryan Green?
There were indeed some rather disreputable alliances formed back in those suspicious times of this then reigning Premier who is still a noisy disrupting individual to this very day.
maybe the tassie premier could do with some of the loot
the lab -greens are now planning to spend up $millions on the tassie bankcard which the tassie treasury does not have, & is not advising whose taxes will be going up to pay for it as yet.
Who would ever believe a tale about an island whose environmental organisations went on an international tour to spruik for what is quite possibly the most rapacious logging concern in the world? And all with the total support of an ostensibly democratic government.
The story, at least, may be worth a quid.
John Hayward
When he backs the YES case Ex Premier Lennon of Betfair and Broadmarsh fame seems a remarkable convert to the Green mantra of the preservation of over 500,000 new State Forest acres into reserves.
On the other hand if you are a lobbyist or hired gun principles tend to go out of the window.
Lennon may I respectfully suggest could be a smoking gun.
“Corruption, bribery, defamation, libel, scam, blockades, deaths, coercion and kickbacks”. Those words may not mean much to the members of the Upper House. I wonder why?
There are leaders and decent vision in our community, just most don’t tend to want to be party to and toe the line to party interests. One can’t lead when your stifled, your vision impaired by a ‘club’ of self interest … Holding a party or indeed government to ransom, which is essentially what Ta ann is doing, is the lowest of the lowest form of government control.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-12-11/mlcs-not-ready-for-forestry-debate/4420314?section=tas
Whilst it is good to hear from Ruth Forest that … ‘there would be no vote until information about funding for the deal has been provided.’ this is such an important issue which involves so many of the community in many different ways, it is ridiculous to have the LegCo sit between Christmas and the New Year – fast tracking with little public insight/input, which will happen in that time, is NOT good enough. Please Ruth Forest push to allow this issue to be properly scrutinized AFTER the New Year. Such important issues require some decency of appropriate consideration.
#5, John Hawkins. A “yes” from Thuggo, or from anyone else in the woodchip club, would indeed be remarkable were it not for such towering conditions as the guarantee that no one complains about gross breaches of the Agreement by the industry over an undefined period.
John Hayward
Can this State not rid itself of this unpopular 17% Thuggo Lennon, this man and his bickering dickering interferences in today’s Tasmania is totally unwarranted, unprincipled, and bound to be hard set against the interests of the Tasmanian people?
He is the man who became a State Premier without being elected, a sort of default result that in time morphed into an insult.
He and his horse-racing mate, the former State Treasurer, Michael Aird, were known for their kind multi-million dollar funding allocations oft directed to their race-course touting drinking mates and in their wasting foolishnesses of taxpayer revenues in other feeble fanciful race-course plotted and promised endeavours.
Has this Lennon now forgotten that his every word in times past was cause for enormous disharmony in our communities State-wide?
Who pays for these former failed and dumped from the job ex-political humbugs that now call themselves lobbyists, as they go about their foot jammed in the doorway lobbying for this State’s very own GBE, widely known for its excessive plundering and destroying of the State’s Ancient Old Growth Forests to their ultimate extinction?
Indeed this GBE is even engaged in chopping the buggery out of the State’s ‘former proclaimed Regrowth Forests,’ (what little there is of these designated areas,) no not for the benefit of this State, but to help that Billionaire Family over in Sarawak to feed the world markets that are easily pursuaded that this timber originating from Tasmania is some sort of highly sustainable Eco-growth???
let there be a pox cast upon the non-profitable, false claiming, gravy-train of looters that dare to call their constant disputational selves to be a legitimate Government Enterprise Business.
Even in the branding of themselves as some sort of responsible caretaker to our forests, by naming its squanderous un-restrained mischievious self as Forestry Tasmania!
What need is being served in this nasty hoaxing action being roundly supported by this State’s government, that has been long played-out and still is- upon the people of Tasmania.
Watching the Legco in action increases dismay. Just about everyone has declared an ‘amour’ for Ta Ann. Do these people not read or acquaint themselves with the international dealings of this group? Due diligence appears to be a misnomer. If big business, international engos and sovereign governments have cause for concern, why doesn’t our Legco? Laundering of timber and money from other places through Sarawak caused international controversy. Alternately, the greasing of influence is more widespread in our polity than has thus far been publicly revealed. The ability of Ta Ann to try to greenwash itself in Tasmania is anathema and should be discontinued. Has Abetz been over there yet to pay his respects? Perhaps he could join up with TWS for their forecast next trip? I can only conclude that Burke and Gillard are trying a $50+million sweetener for the Malaysian timber cartel in the hope of getting a refugee exchange deal in Malaysia. What else could it be?